donno, but i'm starting to think that those without 2GB ram are merely living in self denial.
They know they want 2GB, but they're being sour grapes.
2 GB the way of the future?
2 GB the way of the future?
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 01:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
donno, but i'm starting to think that those without 2GB ram are merely living in self denial.
They know they want 2GB, but they're being sour grapes. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 01:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
- -nuts- -
This post has been edited by pizzaboy: Oct 17 2005, 01:11 AM |
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 11:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(Hornet @ Oct 17 2005, 09:38 AM) more ram alone doesn't make a system any faster, its the system as a whole, not just a component.....it'll be pretty silly for a low end user to get 2Gig, because at the end of the day, the application he runs will be tone down so low that he barely need anything more than 1gig...u have to be running the currently greatest system which can handle a situation where the program will take more than 1 gig, then u'll be utilizing it. that statement was never in my sentence and it's pretty obvious that there are other determinants on the system smoothness and quickness such as the hardisk speed, processor speeds and whatnot. oh yeah, and those who can't stand the lagginess of the hardisk (ain't that always the headache?), there's I-RAM and i think babyelf is going to test them soon. Let's see what he says. |
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 01:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(kingmaker_20 @ Oct 17 2005, 01:17 PM) wow you sure got it at a high pricedefinitely didn't buy frm garage sale didja try 1GBx2 instead la.... it doesn't stress the mem controller as empire had said earlier that much and probably gives u higher overclocks |
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 04:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 11:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(kingmaker_20 @ Oct 17 2005, 11:02 PM) well it's goin for 450 bucks here in garage salehttp://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...2355&hl=twinmos |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 20 2005, 11:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
I heard they say that those who use two cpu's systems, will never return to single cpu systems.
Are the benefits equal to that of dual-core procs? |
|
|
Nov 11 2005, 03:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2006, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
I don't undersatnd why some individuals of peculiar technological fact readers, say that 1 gig and 2 gig, more disk space is needed. God I haven't a clue what u mean by more space is needed with less or more RAMS.
And how does using 2gig require you to have fast ram and fast processor to max out the effects?? Somebody enlighten me, vervain, start. |
|
|
Feb 21 2006, 09:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2006, 12:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
VIP
9,495 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
WOo......and to imagine my surfing PC is only a 1.4GHz Thunderbird with only 256MB of RAMS....
|
| Change to: | 0.0196sec
0.47
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 04:43 PM |