btw our n8 play video in what format?
i have an avi video. can i play it?

me! class4 RM165 (tested speed ~4-6MB/s Write, >18MB/s Read) but beware as there's lots of fade card out there... 

http://www.ebay.com.sg/itm/Sandisk-32GB-Mi...=item519b776b97

---

Added on October 25, 2011, 10:06 amdamn... it's already getting cheaper already...

andre... i get the card about 4 months ago loh... at that time it's consider cheap... 

I don't get why they keep hyping about their polycarbonate design, even on their Lumia 800. It's almost exactly the same as the N9

One part nokia is getting right, their new devices are smoother and more responsive.
Hardware wise, still neglecting the processor, microsd, hdmi, 12mp camera...

The issue is not the "turbo engine". If I wanted turbo engine, I go get Galaxy SII or iPhone 4S. Most important to me is smooth, fast, and responsive user experience.

I felt the experience on S^3 was slow and more often making the N8 feel clunky. See how the Nokia Store stutters from time to time, or that the S^3 itself becomes lagging for unknown reason. Even Angry Birds suffer stuttering from time to time.

What I saw demoed on the WP7 OS no the Nokia Lumia 800 was impressive, and dare I say more impressive than iPhone's iOS. If they could put that OS inside the Nokia N8 I would be a happy clam, but its not possible.

I guess Belle would be my N8's last chance but I'm not counting on it.

Although I don't really like this.. but Nokia's future is now relying on microsoft;
next year would be releasing Apollo OS which supports dualcore, guess that they still able to sustain a bit in the competition :/

but oh please.. i want a true N8 successor >.>

from adliayob .. symbianku dot com
new symbian - accenture

CPU : Dual Cortex Arm CPU 1GHz.
RAM : 1GB RAM
GPU : PowerGL
Skrin : 4.3” Capacitive Clear Black IPS LCD screen
Bateri: Berkapasiti 1650 mAh.
Kamera: Belakang 16MP AutoFocus Lens. Hadapan:1.3MP
Internal Memory: 16GB
Phone Memory : 1GB
Lights : Dual LED with Xenon.

Can N8 flash to Android ROM ??

It doesn't have to be. But with the hardware complaints about Android's OEMs, it's almost guaranteed that a Nokia Android will dominate sales. Of course we all know what happened to that possibility.

lol Technical specs aside, there's a certain flimsy feel about Android phones. So far I have yet to play with one that has a good hardware build. They are always awesome at something, and sucky at other. If an Android looks good, there must be something wrong with it.

Take the S2. The specs is out of this world. But hold it and immediately it gives you a 'cheap' feel.
What about the SE Arc? It looks pretty. But inside it's RAM is just enough to support basic operations.

Well this is not an Android thread. So I think I should stop here. Just adding my 2 cents about the Nokia Android thing.

just wait for the official belle loh... 

I thought this Symbian is in the "Dead Mode". And more surprisingly is that it getting better when it is in the "Dead Mode" then when Nokia was 100% behind it.

I maybe wrong though. Any comment on this?
Thank you in advance.