maybe u want to change for other benchmarks? 32M will be good
i pass prime but fails 32M instantly in some cases
Corsair XMS/Value Overclocking DataBase
Corsair XMS/Value Overclocking DataBase
|
|
Oct 14 2005, 11:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
maybe u want to change for other benchmarks? 32M will be good
i pass prime but fails 32M instantly in some cases |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 12:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
well Corsair's 1GB x 2 Value Select have Samsung UCCC
|
|
|
Oct 15 2005, 01:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
3200XLv1.2 = BP PCB
|
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 01:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
your OCZ Value VX?
they are brain power PCB OCZ's been using brain power PCB for er.. a couple of years.. maybe 4? can't remember corsair only certain revisions use them 3200XLv1.2 4400C25 not sure about C2 but some say they have brain power as well.. mushkin uses brain power as well most of them u can tell by looking at one of the side of the ram it should say B6U808 for 808 6 layer BP PCB some will be 815 etc etc some cheaper brain power PCB will be Dxxxxx |
|
|
Oct 17 2005, 08:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
5.1s won't overclock high..
XLs are TCCD like kiljim said.. XLv1.1 corsair PCB XLv1.2 brain power PCB |
|
|
Oct 18 2005, 12:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
v5.1 hmmm.. if i recall.. not even 250
don't quote me on that.. i can't remember already.. been a while since i followed corsair's stuffs |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 12:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
it depends on which chips they decided to use on the value select.. there's UCCC on 1GB value select too ..
@ magiara both situation have the same CPU speed? it's hard to tell which will be better.. you'll have to try it out yourself.. run some programs and see which one gives u a better score.. superpi, 3dmark, etc etc |
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 12:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
for A64 CPU speed should be more important
i think the reason you can't use DDR400 divider again is because your new value select stick did not come together? might be using a different IC.. |
|
|
Feb 8 2006, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
single stick of ram usually overclocks better
what you can do is.. try the ram individually.. see what they are capable of doing individually.. |
|
|
Feb 9 2006, 12:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia |
post a screenshot of your A64 tweaker..
|
| Change to: | 0.0769sec
0.33
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 04:26 AM |