[RATING] on forumers, as requested by moderator 
Oct 31 2005, 04:47 PM
QUOTE(goldfries @ Oct 15 2005, 02:34 AM)
some times victims are just users without common sense. really.
be wise when do trading. if a deal is too good to be true, why believe it?
usually the victim will be the BUYER.
1. if uncertain - do COD and check the goods before handing the cash.
2. if the person also certified Safe Trader - you have an assurance at least, that the trader is a respectable one.
i find that by following the above 2 points is already enough to safe guard a buyer. at least, that's the principle i use for trading here.
im agree with this.. for me safetrader tag is quite enough already.. be wise when do trading. if a deal is too good to be true, why believe it?
usually the victim will be the BUYER. 1. if uncertain - do COD and check the goods before handing the cash.
2. if the person also certified Safe Trader - you have an assurance at least, that the trader is a respectable one.
i find that by following the above 2 points is already enough to safe guard a buyer. at least, that's the principle i use for trading here.
but the idea is good.. the problem is.. conducting a safetrader tag is hard already (look at the safetrader application thread), and this point system?? maybe u need a few staff just to monitor the system..
by the way good luck.. keep this thing up..
This post has been edited by phreak_id: Oct 31 2005, 04:50 PM
Quote
0.0165sec
1.37
6 queries
GZIP Disabled