Why older games more superior?

1) Games in the old days(Atari, NES, SNES, PS1 age) sells their gameplay if gameplay sux, you're doom, in the present you got good graphic you'll sell, example: Crysis 2, CoD series everything after CoD4 is trash, Duke Nukem series lolz, CnC series, crappy gameplay but good graphic.

2) They're actually getting easier nowadays, most old games are more challenging than new ones, exmple: Crysis series, Crysis 2 is much easier than Crysis 1, Wolfenstein series also getting easier, the Wolfenstein 3D is damn hard to complete lolz.

3) older games focus on offline play, newer games focus on online play(cuz dev make more cash this way), that make newer offline games getting crappier.

4) newer games is very complex compare to old one, it is hard to make good game out of it.

This post has been edited by Kizarh: Oct 17 2011, 06:43 AM

Return to Castle Wolfenstein: Enemy Teritory probably the Best FPS multiplayer ever, not as realistic as modern FPS but the gameplay is much better, BF3's rush mode is based on that game and lots of BF3's component(medic able to revive, support supply bullet which in RTCW:ET is field ops) come from that game, the disappointing down side of RTCW:ET is only 6 maps lolz