Oct 21 2011, 09:58 AM
The G version seems more appealing now...
QUOTE
yellowdroid 2 hours ago
This is what I was told.
Samsung had to use the TI OMAP because it was the new reference platform.
The OMAP processor has DRM componentry built in.
Exynos is losing its edge. The core architecture of Exynos was developed by chip designer, Intrinsity. Apple poached them and Intrisinity is no-longer under contract to ful-fill future SOC architectural design for Samsung.
A key note. The OMAP is what allows the camera to be "virtually" lag-free by a few milleseconds.
The whole SOC is pretty much an entire package - audio,gfx, IC, bus and not a la carte. Think of it like a ATOM chipset or NVIDIA ION package.
This is what I was told.
Samsung had to use the TI OMAP because it was the new reference platform.
The OMAP processor has DRM componentry built in.
Exynos is losing its edge. The core architecture of Exynos was developed by chip designer, Intrinsity. Apple poached them and Intrisinity is no-longer under contract to ful-fill future SOC architectural design for Samsung.
A key note. The OMAP is what allows the camera to be "virtually" lag-free by a few milleseconds.
The whole SOC is pretty much an entire package - audio,gfx, IC, bus and not a la carte. Think of it like a ATOM chipset or NVIDIA ION package.
Quote
0.0443sec
0.38
7 queries
GZIP Disabled