"A very impressive DSLR with an excellent feature set and possibly the best high ISO performance in its class. The lack of visible AF points is a frustrating omission, but if you can live with that the K-x is a little cracker, and a bargain too." - DPReview
Added on October 13, 2011, 2:26 amThen again... if your budget allows you to go beyond the RM2000 limit... then go ahead with 600D or D5100 (better yet D7000 - built-in AF motor)...
... if budget still not more than RM2000...
Best option to buy based on TIPA awards and DPreview assessments: Nikon D3100 - 72% Canon 1100D - 69% Pentax K-x - 73%
Do your in-depth research like I did... and you will arrive with the above choice...
This post has been edited by CyberSetan: Oct 13 2011, 02:53 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
From: Im a Medical Officer in /K. I'm here to lepak.
QUOTE(neil_squadron @ Oct 13 2011, 03:34 AM)
Bro,thanz very much,ur info really enlightens me btw,can i upgrade the lenses by buying it later individually when i have more money? Im also wondering if this camera is good for night shots? sorry,im noob
For entry level camera - Pentax K-x is excellent for night shots~
...and for lenses, of course you can add more lenses later be it from Pentax or other 3rd party makers (eg; Sigma, Tamron)...
...and also, Pentax lenses even from 20-30 years ago CAN BE USED with a modern day Pentax DSLR~!!
I've got 3 50mm lenses f/1.4, f/1.7 and f/2.0 (bought them all because they were cheap ) , a Pentax FA 75-320mm zoom lens, and others - some of which were made even before I was born and yet I'm happily using them right now~
Do one thing... go to the Dpreview link for pentax K-x above - go the conclusion page, scroll down, you will find the comparison tool, then switch it on, add all categories...
Try comparing the Pentax K-x with other DSLRs and see under the "Low light / high ISO performance" ... you will be amazed...
QUOTE(jloi @ Sep 30 2011, 10:37 PM)
RM1500-2000 wun make lowlight perform well too without sufficient lighting..unless u getting Nikon D3S
... just for fun.. try comparing the "Low light / high ISO performance" with a Nikon D3s... (of course cannot match laa - but just see first)
Added on October 13, 2011, 4:57 am
QUOTE(ieR @ Oct 13 2011, 04:00 AM)
mmmmmmmmmmm i wondering... under rm2k, good iso till 1600 (some say 3200), why not a NEX?
If he is interested in that style of shooting, the NEX-3 is within his budget~ Sure, why not?
This post has been edited by CyberSetan: Oct 13 2011, 05:57 AM