and then u'll ask why I can't do this or do that.......oh because it needs JAILBREAK.  And then u'll ask why can't I copy my songs into the phone?  oh because u need ITUNES installed on your PC.  This happened to a lot of ppl who thought that liephone is easy to use "out of the box" but it's NOT true.  iOS is just pathetic

whereas SGS2 is REALLY out of the box, u don't have to do anything to do ANY kind of stuff on it, just switch it on, log in to google account and go market to download what u need, that's it

It's not really that definitive to compare the mentioned as it's not really on the same level. Having said that, it's "fairer" to compare the iPhone5 with Galaxy S II or Galaxy Note.

I was torn apart from Samsung's Galaxy S II and Apple's iPhone4 (since iPhone5 is still in the horizon) but when it comes to technicality and functions, there's a vast differences.

Build: I must say iPhone4 due to the industrial design of glass and metal. The Galaxy S II has glass and the only drawback it suffers is the flimsy, thin back cover which is made of plastic. Personally, glass and metal is hard to resist and I must say iPhone4 is the winner. However, the Galaxy S II is more anorexic than the iPhone4.

Screen: HELL YEAH! This is utmost important as you'll be looking at the screen whenever you take out your mobile. Enough said. You want your eyes to be mesmerised by colour like those M&M candies, take the Galaxy S II. It sure looks bright and awesome! The iPhone4 has more pixel per inch but the colour is a little "natural" and you get a small packet of Tic-tacs instead. Depends on personal preference. I, myself, would say Galaxy S II is the winner but then again, that's just me.

Oh, Galaxy S II gives you a bigger screen. 4.3" of bright, coloured wonders.

Processor: Samsung's 1.2GHz dual-core Qualcomm processor takes home the crown. Nothing much to be added.

Camera: Forget about Facetime. 8 Megapixel versus 5 Megapixel. Galaxy S II has one hell of a functionalities when it comes to camera. LED flash is not much in reality but it's an added value, nevertheless.

It's September right now and inevitably the iPhone4's successor will come when the time comes. The question is, are you willing to wait? Time and tide waits for no one and when the time comes, it would be iPhone5 versus Galaxy Note.

When it happens, it'll be back to square one and you'll be creating another thread in similarities to this one and that's where the whole wide world will be on a déjà vu experience like in the past, present and future.

1st question ... similan are you kentanggoreng?
2nd... ip4 tend to pk SGS... not SGS II! No doubts sgs II pawn ip4 easily... this the fact..take it or leave it
3rd... dual core eat more battery? basically u r noob in technology... go google... dual core vs single core in battery consumption... opps... forgot to add another point for SGSII there is a 2000mAh battery for sgs 2~
p/s: Im leaving this post, im not gonna argue with this kentanggorreng 2.0~ as we all know he is an Apple's shoe licker...

nuclear battery 

1) sorry, dun understand this question.

2) sgs is reaction to iphone 3g. sgs2 is designed to counter ip4, but as the scores turn out, a 1 year old apple design still wins samsung latest and greatest.

3) if apple uses dual-core, it will be done properly and energy efficient. look at ipad2.
reason is simple.
that is bcos apple designed both hardware and software so it works perfectly.
unfortunately, android is copied from iOS but it wasn't done right.
And so it becomes very cumbersome, prone to lags and crashes.
Therefore android needs powerful hardware to achieve half the things iOS can achieve.
So heat and battey issues are the things droidfags get butthurt easily.

Android had been improved recently but still is far behind apple technology.

pls accept the facts.

Just jumped ship from ip4 to android(SGS 2) and im very happy with my decision. I felt free.. Haha. Android is sure fun..