TEAM Xtreem BH-5
|
|
 Oct 5 2005, 06:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia  
|
32M
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2005, 11:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
lol yea.. added to my collection.. when i finish testing might take the UCCC out to play next
 |
|
|
Oct 6 2005, 07:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
really sweet
2.59v 200mhz 2-2-2-5  |
|
|
Oct 7 2005, 10:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
QUOTE(remysix @ Oct 7 2005, 06:24 AM) bro...just curious...can u get the same result wif diff proc...last time, using my 3200+ E3...i can hit 265@2225 memtest stable...but know when i used this 3000+ E6...only 260...not even 261 without getting errors in memtest...i think this is one of the cons of having mem controller build-in the proc...changing the proc might give u diff result... yea.. memory controller plays a very big role on ram clocking..   and another thing that will affect ram clocking is temps.. lower temps will clock ram higher.. cooler memory controller will go really high looking forward to my phase change unit soon.. should be sweet |
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 09:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
well to prove that memory controller does differ
my FX is clocking the ram at 266mhz now |
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 04:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
at 3.7
but not stable.. only memtest stable tho |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2005, 07:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
well it sucks when you don't have the processor that clocked it higher before
if you have a new processor that clocks it better u won't be complaining imo |
|
|
Oct 12 2005, 09:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
there are 2 better chips than UCCC
there's ballistix (but micron won't sell their chips to other manuf) and there's the new OCZ EB PC4000 kit i'm thinking of about 280+ 3-4-4-8 for the TEAM UCCC |
|
|
Oct 12 2005, 09:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
lolz........
|
|
|
Oct 14 2005, 04:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
updated first, second and third post with benchies.. one of them will have to have a rerun.. must've left something running and made the score lower..
note that i'm using new dividers that runs ram at a higher speed DDR400/433/466/500 |
|
|
Nov 16 2005, 06:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
i'll see what i can find out
|
|
|
Nov 22 2005, 07:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
told u on msn
it's tested to run stock.. but overclocking wise i'm not sure.. i haven't had an intel rig for more than 7 years lol.. last one P3 |
|
|
Dec 5 2005, 01:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 9 2005, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
TEAM BH5 owners
mind posting some preliminary results here? |
|
|
Dec 14 2005, 07:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
for BH5 mosfet cooling (beside jp17 jumper) is very important on the DFI..
read to write will only work up to 250 or so at 1.. after that you will need 2.. i'll be bringing one rig back and will probably meet up with someone and try his pair and see how it goes.. |
|
|
Dec 26 2005, 07:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
there's no tighter afaik..
the higher the drive strength the more stability you get for an overclocked ram.. same goes for data strength |
|
|
Dec 27 2005, 11:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
I haven't gotten the DDR500 one yet.. the previous TEAM TCCD i had goes up to ~ 600+ 2.5-3-3-7
|
|
|
Jan 2 2006, 05:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
QUOTE(Hungry_Wolf @ Jan 2 2006, 12:28 PM) mine can't do 233mhz....anybody can help me? msg me on msn tonight lots of error at then end of test 5....  |
|
|
Jan 3 2006, 01:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
Lanparty NF4-D should be the same as the other Lanparty boards.. just without SATA II..
|
|
|
Jan 3 2006, 01:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
|
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Sydney - Australia
|
kbsao!! did DDR640 / 320Mhz with his pair of TEAM TCCD at 2.7v.. busy lately so he haevn't got the chance of trying it out higher..
i brought my 3000+ Venice with an awesome memory controller back.. will try one of the TEAM TCCD from the next batch.. |
| Change to: |  0.0230sec
 0.62
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 04:39 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.