component cable n composite AV is different
but use same output from PS3, different output cable/differ input to TV
components


composite

QUOTE(andrewcha @ Nov 16 2011, 09:03 AM)
as a general tech wise, if you know that your hdmi port is already faulty then anything you put in should have nothing comes out, of course you can buy 1 and try it out though.
if not mistaken there is no component cable for ps3. i never see an original component for ps3 too. i might be wrong.
bought HDMI cable, yes nothing comeout...but looks like can detect HDMI port plugged in somethin...
ps3 component cable got, but official stop production i think...got aftermarket
QUOTE(Gaia34 @ Nov 16 2011, 09:19 AM)
ps2 component cable can be use on ps3..

yes can
QUOTE(GamersFamilia @ Nov 16 2011, 09:40 AM)
3rd party component cable are easy to get especially in KL
component cable for other device easy to get, for PS3/2 its rare. coz PS3/2 got own type multi AV port
QUOTE(andrewcha @ Nov 16 2011, 09:57 AM)
oh yeah. but don't expect it comes out to be as smooth and nice as hdmi as is still using av port. try to use tv or lcd less than 32 inch then i think the picture will be ok.
u rite bro, will test once i received it tmrw

QUOTE
What are DVI, HDMI and Component Video?
DVI/HDMI and Component Video are all video standards which support a variety of resolutions, but which deliver the signal from the source to the display in very different ways. The principal important difference is that DVI/HDMI deliver the signal in a digital format, much the same way that a file is delivered from one computer to another along a network, while Component Video is an analog format, delivering the signal not as a bitstream, but as a set of continuously varying voltages representing (albeit indirectly, as we'll get to in a moment) the red, green and blue components of the signal.
Both DVI/HDMI and Component Video deliver signals as discrete red, green, and blue color components, together with sync information which allows the display to determine when a new line, or a new frame, begins. The DVI/HDMI standard delivers these along three data channels in a format called T.M.D.S., which stands for "Transmission Minimized Differential Signaling." Big words aside, the T.M.D.S. format basically involves a blue channel to which horizontal and vertical sync are added, and separate green and red channels.
Component Video is delivered, similarly, with the color information split up three ways. However, component video uses a "color-difference" type signal, which consists of Luminance (the "Y", or "green," channel, representing the total brightness of the image), Red Minus Luminance (the "Pr," or "Red," channel), and Blue Minus Luminance (the "Pb," or "Blue," channel). The sync pulses for both horizontal and vertical are delivered on the Y channel. The display calculates the values of red, green and blue from the Y, Pb, and Pr signals.
Both signal types, then, are fundamentally quite similar; they break up the image in similar ways, and deliver the same type of information to the display, albeit in different forms. How they differ, as we'll see, will depend to a great extent upon the particular characteristics of the source and display devices, and can depend upon cabling as well.
So, which is better, DVI or component? HDMI or component? The answer--unsatisfying, perhaps, but true--is that it depends. It depends upon your source and display devices, and there's no good way, in principle, to say in advance whether the digital or the analog connection will render a better picture. You may even find, say, that your DVD player looks better through its DVI or HDMI output, while your satellite or cable box looks better through its component output, on the same display. In this case, there's no real substitute for simply plugging it in and giving it a try both ways.
http://www.ecoustics.com/electronics/produ...les/122868.htmlThis post has been edited by kento: Nov 16 2011, 04:01 PM