QUOTE(highwind85 @ Nov 14 2011, 06:29 AM)
+1...That's exactly what i feel now....feels like the photos i shoot with 60D is worse than e-pl1...
The zen of shooting with viewfinder and LCD totally different so this effects the outcome. VF feels more intimate while LCD (dare I say) more accurate in framing.
QUOTE(lonelywolf90 @ Nov 14 2011, 12:37 PM)
So, you're saying that EVIL and M43 are actually different systems right?
I did refer to certain sites via google, I still don't get it. Some say that they are the same while some say that they are different, please clear my head about this

I was considering the D5100 from Nikon as the price seems affordable and it has great features plus the excellence in image quality(breath-taking), but when I ventured further into other systems such as EVIL & M43, I'm getting undecisive whether to purchase a DSLR.
What are your opinions about EVIL & M43? Will they become the future cameras and have the DSLRs phased out?
EVIL & M43 are very compact after all.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 seems to be a great device despite the limited kit lens(only two), on par with the D5100 Nikon or better?

Let's put it another way....
EVIL/MILC/ILC or whatever they call it is a category of cameras typically having a bigger sensor than compacts, have interchangeable lens and doesn't come with a mirror assembly.
Micro Four Third is just one system in this category. There's quite a few companies that is part of this system but only Panasonic and Olympus is active. Lens are interchangeable within the micro four third system... the lens will have a micro 4/3 logo.
Other EVIL/MILC/ILC/MILF systems includes Sony's NEX (E-mount) system, Nikon's 1 (CX mount) system, Samsung's NX system and Pentax's Q system.
Primary benefit of EVIL/MILC/ILC is that they are seen to be more portable and less geeky than DSLR's.
In terms of which is better... personally I prefer a DSLR + compact camera combo....though I'm following the developments with great interest..... YMMV... depends on the shooter.