So apparently Tesco Puchong is shifting it's location to make way for the new LRT station at its current place.

Currently it is under construction @ Bandar Bukit Puchong, and I smell trouble brewing with the local Indian community.

Right in the middle of the site, there's one small temple which seems to not going to move anytime soon.

I wonder if anyone can shed light on this aspect of hindu temple since I believe the site is not owned by them. By law, they have no right to be there in the very first place. But now, since it has been running for quite a while it will be a struggle to relocate the temple somewhere else. The question here is, does Hindu not allow for such practice? and how does the practice of declaring a site as a temple works? Do they just simply choose a spot, or do they need some kind of inspiration or signs from Gods to declare the place holy?

I will post pictar later when I pass through that route later today or tomorrow.

haha that's what i think as well, until the construction went underway. It's very clear now, since they remove everything else but the temple.

you can apply logic here.

a temple in the middle of a construction site.


what gives?

the temple does not look new. seems like it has been there for quite some time. no issue about supporting illegal temple or what not.

if someone wanna do something, they should do so at the very beginning, not when it has been frequented for years. i'm very certain it's going to be harder to relocate now than when it first started.

oh sudah ada tesco puchong topic. make sense for the mod to merge with the old one. gj mod.

here you go, pictures delivered as evidence, the last few even pics of people visiting the temple

This post has been edited by dagnarus: Sep 16 2011, 10:43 PM

not really abandoned, check my post prior, there are people there.

last week, they even set up camp with 2 huge tents filled with people