i have been preparing for it since 2002..........bought silver and gold
Reduce borrowings........ and wait for the plunge
I am preparing for Global Recession, Be cash rich
I am preparing for Global Recession, Be cash rich
|
|
Sep 7 2011, 07:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
i have been preparing for it since 2002..........bought silver and gold
Reduce borrowings........ and wait for the plunge |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 8 2011, 07:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(keelim @ Sep 7 2011, 08:10 AM) In the looming recession it is best for equity investors to reposition their shaeholding into financial and utilities stock. The past 4 recessions had taught investors to stick with reits and banks. I don't understand why forumers are advising people to flee the property market. Methinks its not time to reposition into finance stocks.A recession means these stocks will suffer.............buy DURING the recession when they are killed.......... They will get killed because the property mkt will get killed........aka U.S in 2008. Property mkt is almost always last to tank before a recession.......watch out for China When property mkt get killed the speculators will become defunct.......... This post has been edited by prophetjul: Sep 8 2011, 07:50 AM |
|
|
Sep 8 2011, 09:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Sep 8 2011, 10:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(smartinvestor01 @ Sep 8 2011, 10:39 AM) National News Thats what happened to U.S............highly geared DEBT...... methinks our paternalisticI dont think cutting the subsidies is enough, there are many things that cannot be avoided.. According to www.transparency.org, our Corruption Perceptions Index is 4.4, while Singapore is 9.3, better than us.. Country recession and our country highly debt issue, i think highly debt issue is the worse part.. attitude of our politics has made it too late to turn around. Just look at the population of civil servants.........last estimate at 1.6mil. Our pop is only around 27mil....do you need 1 civil servant to serve 17 people? next, if our attitude of deficit spending is not reeled in, EPF will be kaput............... see the thread in real world section |
|
|
Sep 8 2011, 09:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(smartinvestor01 @ Sep 8 2011, 02:46 PM) Bravo, good quote about the statistics of 1 civil servant serving 17 people.. Well, its not that i want to say we private sectors are good, but we can really see the poor service from the gov agencies.. Last few days i made a call to follow up with a government agency, and guess what? They did not even intended to answer the phone.. Even after answer the phone, they talk fiercely.. If the government keep on rising the salary of those pension people, even declared bonus, sorry la, how long can our country stand? Imagine average all those pensioners can live a long live, then all the pensioners are creditors to the country... Rm40b is for the salaries of gov servants, past and present. If this goes on, how will the country sustain such practices? |
|
|
Sep 9 2011, 07:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Sep 8 2011, 10:02 PM) edyek, AND discontine the LUMP sum EPF withdrawals.......use annuities........... this will prolong the EPF monies.....Increase LEGAL retirement age to 75. Keep the EPF money 20 years longer.. Sell the IDEA as helping RAKYAT to save for retirement.. Dreamer whatever is left of it |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2011, 08:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(dreamer101 @ Sep 9 2011, 08:09 AM) prophetjul, Thats right...........AND they will continue with MGS bond issues to be subscribed by EPF to............toThe BEST part of this is IT does not affect civil servants since civil servants are not on EPF. Dreamer fund the paying of the 1.6mil GOV SERVANTS salaries and pensions............ Whatta a nice merry go round......... till the EPF cow becomes............................. ![]() This post has been edited by prophetjul: Sep 9 2011, 08:50 AM |
|
|
Sep 15 2011, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Sep 15 2011, 10:37 AM) Genneva Gold - how much is the price per gram compared to others like UOB's physical or gold account? Like 30% above spot........if you like paying yerself......... From my earlier checks and readings, it's at a premium vs other "real gold" and the premium may be the "returns"/hibah "one gets back", thus one is paying one self... sounds like.. My apologies if i'm mistaken |
|
|
Sep 15 2011, 11:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Sep 15 2011, 10:54 AM) The verdict is in. Gold taikor Prophetjul has spoken They CAN sustain the 1.5% payment PROVIDED their sales continue to ride on the gold wave(it could beBTW, just to share why/how i checked "Geneva" out: Email a few months ago ------ Based on what i understand and know, it's a sucker's game for customers (or should i say greedy fools). Check this out - spells it out easily how their business model works: http://www.guizai.com/finance/genneva-gold-investment Here is how they operate: 1. They usually buy the gold from UOB bullion based on spot price and sell you at 20%-24% markup price 2. They paid their sales agent commission 1.5% for selling this program every time you renew monthly. A total of 18% a year. 3. They promised to buy from you 100% based on your last selling price and pay you 2% 30 days later (but refuse to write down in black and white invoice for 2% as payment but as rebate as discount) 4. The business is usually registered in Malaysia or a Condo address in Singapore with website full of spelling errors and no detailed mention of founders or their management team. With the markup, they pay U with your own $ ;P. How long can this last? It depends on how many suckers continue buying. Mama says dont pay $1.24 for something everyone is selling for $1, to make/sellback $0.02 per month AND it's not written in any contract -------- On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:46 PM, XXX <xxx> wrote: Hi there, MK. Gold Investment 1.5-2% Montly Interest Rate.... Too Good To Be True. Recalled telling you one of my friends is doing this gold investment thing. He was unable/ reluctant to give me the details one year ago but recently when we met up, he told me the company name is Geneva/ Gineva..... Giving upto 1.5-2% interest rate/ month based on the amout u buy. When asked hw come they are willing to share the profit with buyers... His answer is interesting: " These companies are buying many many kgs of GOLD they got good rate....so when we buy ..the use our money for further purchase of gold." Can GOLD be purchased at lower rate if bought in a bulk....??? Sounds news to me....GOLD is commodity... Not any barangan in TESCO, Giant...MyDin? True/ False??? There are many stories on this Geneva/Gineva Gold investment online. However, online resources aside, have you heard of this Geneva/Gineva? I have to admit that this is not my field...as you read much more than I do on this area. Kindly share your expert opinion.....before you share with Personal Money. Whaahhhhhahahahaha TULIPS as long as its the intthing) Imagine if gold price turns down 30% today and the flavour goes out of the window? |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 10:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(Singh_Kalan @ Sep 15 2011, 10:09 PM) "There is no ceiling for Stock market either" - Singh Kalan Pray tell why IS gold a bubble? Qualify please...........I think its stupid to buy gold at this time. People think gold is safe, it is not always true. As with any trades that has bubble up, it will burst. Added on September 16, 2011, 10:04 am QUOTE(rakyat @ Sep 15 2011, 10:28 PM) Over a 20 year period it is slightly higher then the avg inflation rate, only last 3 to 5 yrs had it provided decent returns In USD terms 2002- $240 p OZ cometh 2011 - $1800 = 750% In Ringgit terms 2002- Rm1150 cometh 2011 - Rm5700 = 495% Methinks thats more than DECENT! This post has been edited by prophetjul: Sep 16 2011, 10:05 AM |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(sevendogz @ Sep 16 2011, 10:34 AM) been reading some conspiracy stuff about united states of europe, it's scary better believe it..........the world econs is controlled by one set of peoplebasically to reach their goal of US of Europe, they need to tank the economy so bad, or something catastrophic to change the europe ppl mind to support it The BANKSTERS |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 06:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Sep 16 2011, 05:17 PM) It depends how one calculates. i am only replying the fella who mentioned gold in last 3 to 5 yrs had provided decent returnsIt also can be pointed up, In USD term. 1970's USD500 cometh 2011 USD1800 = 260% 35 years for 260% return, is not something very proud of, and definitely is not decent, nor even can catch up the inflation, nor beating FD rate by miles. it was pretty decent from 10 years ago, no? http://www.usagold.com/reference/prices/1970.html Gold price in 1970 averaged approx $35, not $500 Just did a calculation 1970 $35 cometh 2011 $1850 COMPOUNDED returns = 10.16% Whats FD from thence? Pretty decent no? This post has been edited by prophetjul: Sep 16 2011, 06:23 PM |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 06:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Sep 16 2011, 06:23 PM) Yes, it is decent from 2003 to 2011. There is no doubt. No body mentioned about the FUTURE.............its about the past.But next 3 to 5 years down the road, nobody knows. It can even more magnificent, it can be pathetic as well. Gold price during late 1979 to early 1980's was USD200-700. Gold investor during that period suffer at least 20-25 years without any return, while at the same time, FD give you more than 200% return during this period, stock can register you at least 1000%, properties 1000% etc. I don't mean to say gold is good or bad, what I want to highlight, a thing can be looked from different angle and can show you good/bad result from the different angle. People can say stock is worth to invest, as stock has gain more than 100% from 2009 to 2011. But another one can say, stock is not worth to invest, because from 2007 to 2011, stock still making a loss. So a slight different angle or selective period of comparison, the outcome result is totally different. While, whether it is decent for last 3 years, 5 years or 10 years, it doesn't give us a clue or any good indicator whether it is good or not to invest in it. Look at my calculations above.........over 41 years since gold was FIXED in 1970 at $35, the compounded returns pa is $10.16%. More than decent i say.................... Another 3, 5, 10 years could be Armageddon............... |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 06:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Sep 16 2011, 06:28 PM) Locally, FD rate in the old day (1980's time) was around 7-9%. Do a calculation.........those high FD rates are only for short time i believe.US Fed fund rate during early 1980's was double digit aka >10%. Even then gold's return over the last 41 years USD terms is 10.16% Added on September 16, 2011, 6:32 pm QUOTE(cherroy @ Sep 16 2011, 06:28 PM) Locally, FD rate in the old day (1980's time) was around 7-9%. Why take 1980? Why not take the base price when it was fixed?US Fed fund rate during early 1980's was double digit aka >10%. Added on September 16, 2011, 6:30 pm If from 1970's $35 to now $1800, is a 10.16% pa. return rate. Then from 1980 $200/300 to now, is what rate then? Added on September 16, 2011, 6:33 pmIf 1980 you bought at $300, todate returns is still a DECENT 6% COMPOUNDED- not bad.......IMO i just checked gold price at lowest in 1980 was $481 so returns based on $481 is 4.44% This post has been edited by prophetjul: Sep 16 2011, 06:35 PM |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 06:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Sep 16 2011, 06:35 PM) I am not saying FD beat gold, as FD is always the worst return rate one. Pls show FD gave 6% compounded from 1980.............. wheres the data?Just selective period of using, then outcome result can be totally different. I can use gold over the last 30 years return from early 1980's to now, can be as low as 5-6% pa. compounded. Which mean comparable to FD rate only. So for a person invest in gold and FD at the same time during early 1980's, the result can be the same. |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 06:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Sep 16 2011, 06:37 PM) Why take 1970 then? Pls show data on FD rates......Why not take 1950, or 1930? 4.44%, I can assure FD beat it. Don't get me wrong, I am not disagreeing on the statement posted, Both, or every data we posted is a correct, just how it is looked upon. i take 1970 because gold price was FIXED at $35.........no price before that so its reasonable to take it from there. 40 years is a long enougn period for interest |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 06:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Sep 16 2011, 06:41 PM) FD rate was above 6-7% for quite a long time since 1980's, FD rate only plummeting after 1998 financial crisis. No fair........best to get a baseline........1970 as you have mentioned yereslf........FD is a compounded investment, your interest can be compounded one. So if 10 years time the FD rate is 6%, it is giving out 6% compounded rate for the last 10 years. Added on September 16, 2011, 6:43 pm I don't have data, if my memory serve me well, I put FD at rate around 6-7%, since late 1970's to early 1990's. Then it is reasonable for me to use 1980's gold price as base, as I was starting investing during that time. So no fair? when gold price was fixed at $35. Afterall we are looking at a SPECIFIC asset class |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 09:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(Singh_Kalan @ Sep 16 2011, 09:09 PM) The BLR peaks during 1998 @ >12%, meaning the FD interest rate should be quite high too. You must be young to remember. i maybe older than you.......That peak was short and sweet.........i cleared my property investment loan that year. Some years they go down as low as presently........2% We are looking for the data on interest rates from 1970......do you have them? Added on September 16, 2011, 10:38 pmFound this table from 1980...the average from 1980 to 2009 was 6.1%....its even lower from 2010 to 2011 Showed that during interest rates peak in 1997-98, the FD rates did not follow upwards ![]() This post has been edited by prophetjul: Sep 16 2011, 10:43 PM |
|
|
Sep 17 2011, 11:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Sep 17 2011, 08:07 AM) Bro Singh_Kalan, our fellow forumer Prophetjul is old enough to have seen and understand at least 3 cycles and more (ie. i've only seen & understood 3 Bro WongBTW, i personally remembered 12%+ FD (1yr tenure) was in the 80s leh. Bro Prophetjul - U must be feeling good to be thought of as too young to remember 1998 This got me a good morning chuckle Twas pretty high in 1997/98 as well to stave off the currency sharks. Look at the chart i posted i paid off my property loans that year! i AM YOUNG! Added on September 17, 2011, 11:51 am QUOTE(kaiserwulf @ Sep 17 2011, 09:33 AM) You being older than him has nothing to do with the previous statement "You may be too young to remember". Oh boy.....someone whos not in the discussion making an adhominem statementJust keep ego out of this. makes yer day.......... TROLL AWAY! This post has been edited by prophetjul: Sep 17 2011, 12:02 PM |
|
|
Sep 17 2011, 02:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,275 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Sep 17 2011, 12:26 PM) Hey Young Uncle Prophetjul (from a slightly younger & dumber uncle Bro Wong er.. or i was not having enough caffeine in my blood yet Sorry a bit of miscom. The chart is for FD rates. i was refering to bank lending interest rates.....apologies That lending rate, in 1997/1998 was around 12% but if you noticed, FD rates did not follow the lending rates in 1998. Just pointing that to cherroy whos adamant that even FDs better than gold |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0272sec
0.76
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 12:23 AM |