What camera are u using now? Normally I don't use DRO at all. Turn them off.

newbie reporting in...

uish...where got maa...still using Auto mode u noe...
*evade selipar from will*

penat woo will...instantly got 14 nieces & nephews...koyak poket...

Which 70-300?

The 75-300 or the 70-300G or the Tamron's 70-300 ?

Tested the Tamron's 70-300, quite good bargain for its price.

Unless you rather get a 70-300G from Sony, the Tamron might just do fine.

Off topic -

Many people keep saying, upgrading to FF ish good and etc. But frankly, how many of us do really use the full potential of the FF? I don't geddit when some newbie who just got lotsa cash to go around and say I've gone FF, wow~"

Personally, I do not do large size printings, 4R normally nia. I don't think I'll use the full potential of the FF since i've yet to max out my aps-c potential, thus no reason to even go FF. Is that something logical? XD

well if using A850 n A900, setting in the camera allow it to use aps-c lens but just in smaller size! 

Erm depending on what you mean....

If you'd know you are going full frame, might as well prepare towards FF rather than buying DT/Aps-c lens and selling em off later right?
No rules saying for pros only, but FF does bring an illusion that one's somehow

Ehem, never mind. Scrape that topic.

FF... i also dunno whats the hype of it, most gearhead i know tell be because more bokeh... =.= anyway, what the hell is bokeh?

shukrie : wow! nice~!

---

Added on September 7, 2011, 6:04 pm
" out of focus " simple... but many people out of focus 'image' is ugly. that is when quality of bokeh is in question. bright line, cat eye, soft transition etc

Wait Unker chin lol.

Or test in your dreams. Slowly lo.
Tamron 70-300? The newer one with USD ka? Around 1.4k perhaps?

Put it this way, (most of the time, not always) the shorter the focal length from its widest point to the narrowest point, the better the image quality is from that particular lens. So, an 18-55 kit lens is actually better than the 18-70, and so on.

Wouldn't your Tammy 18-270 cover enough range as a travel lens?

edit: sorry, just noticed that it wasn't you who asked the question in the 1st place

For me, when I go travelling, sure I using begpack and full armor loaded, dont wan to miss the moment. Else after came back just said, aiyo...why so soft, not nice...bla bla bla...

wah! shukrie! veli nice, prefect imagination!

   

Guide = use your imagination.

#3

DSC07971.jpg by ZX Chin, on Flickr

C&C pls. tq.

and also.. wanna ask about photoshop CS3 ya. i shoot RAW, then in photoshop to retain the EXIF data, i shud click "save as..." then jpg. then ok ad rite? i use to get it like tat previously but dunno y this time don have EXIF data ad.

popfish: tqvm.. but don get me wrong, i admit tat i'm the most noob photoshop user. XP this photo oni increased contrast, and corrected the white balance a bit. XP others are as shot.

Did you just found out about this piece of news?

You sure or not 12fps? Unless your friend have the A77 

It will not 'anti photo blur' actually. That will depends on your shutter speed.

Zstan, what u doing? U sound more like bragging than giving proper information. Why u wanna do that? :doh: later ppl butthurt then u sengaja cari pasal only. I'm trying to bridge the gap between different brand users by slowly getting to get others to share thoughts not only among themselves but as photographers in general. Ur not helping by talking like that.

Anyway I think I won't think of FF for now la. Broke... Sigh.