Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V54!, The Orange Legion

views
     
ieR
post Oct 28 2011, 10:16 PM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 28 2011, 07:42 PM)
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/a77-raws-are-not-real-raw/

Can somebody explain this post in simple English? rclxub.gif
*
they say

QUOTE
that extra dot one noise means the END OF THE WORLD


or was it

QUOTE
i'm a Math Genius, f*** off photographers


or maybe they were saying

QUOTE
(in robot voice) i am a gear head, i dont know what is "go out door and take more photo" means


something like that.

i wont even bother, i am still using my A300, and it still beat the crap out of D7000. i mean photo, not the technical mumbo jumbo.
ieR
post Oct 28 2011, 10:28 PM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(Zicron @ Oct 28 2011, 10:07 PM)
I remember there is a photo of a900+2470 full of dust 1, anyone still has it?
*
it was a700
Attached Image


Added on October 28, 2011, 10:30 pm
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 28 2011, 10:19 PM)
btw thanks guys for the congrats! notworthy.gif
noise test shot coming soon!
raining la cant go out take nice shot  doh.gif
2moro la brows.gif


Added on October 28, 2011, 10:25 pmvery unscientific noise test...
Sony A65 + Sony 55-200 SAM
Noise Reduction : Normal

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


overall im very satisfied with these results...btw who will use ISO6400 or 12800?
cheers  biggrin.gif
*
i do~ tongue.gif 6400 is common for me now a day.... but that 6400 shot, just make my day, its beautiful.


This post has been edited by ieR: Oct 28 2011, 10:30 PM
ieR
post Oct 29 2011, 12:30 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
my bag are pack, i'm ready to go...

ieR
post Oct 29 2011, 12:51 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
zstan posted the thing from dpreview or alpha rumor, they stated, shooting with -2ev, and up with PP, it give better noise control. EHEM. go try it.
ieR
post Oct 29 2011, 01:00 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
ya, but less noise then shoooting higher iso. that what the silly article said.
ieR
post Oct 29 2011, 02:02 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Oct 29 2011, 01:01 AM)
err....tried....busted! the guy is BULLSH*T  shakehead.gif
for ISO 1600 ...it still can mantain...but for 6400...NO


Added on October 29, 2011, 1:04 am
nono...is overexposed and decrease the exposure after that...
*
aduh, i dont think u get it, when the guy mention bout say, iso1000, say u wanna hit 6400, just lower it 2 2/3 stops~ then increase it back in PP, then compare the 6400 vs 1000(22/3 increase)
ieR
post Oct 29 2011, 07:55 AM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
Albert, do u know the native ISO for sony apsc 24mp sensor?

8 Pages « < 6 7 8Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0431sec    0.96    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 07:48 PM