Its about calling the airstrike, or being the airstrike itself. LOL.

i dont think so..since cod fans will buy the new cod even if it is good or bad..and battlefield gameplay is not the same as the cod..

no...you don't get the point
people searching for the best bang for the bucks game
for MW3,maybe some fans like the stories campaign
but you have to admit the multiplayer expriences that you can get from Battlefield 3 is much more better then Modern Warfare 3
there aren't many people who can afford buying originals for both of this game
plus if only for singleplayer
jack sparrow version is enough
while multiplayer required originals

yeah i gotta agree..i am a big fan of cod4 and mw2 but i might pass on this one since its quite the same and its repetitive. the original developers of mw2 has left activision and its seems like its still the same mw2 except for some minor add ons. For single player game no doubt mw will be way better but as for multiplayer experience... i guess i'll pass.

in addition to that..damn activision jacked mw price through the roof..its damn expensive.

---

Added on September 3, 2011, 3:53 pmwhat's worse is that those damn hackers always find a way to ruin the game.

This post has been edited by ExCrIpT: Sep 3 2011, 03:53 PM

i foresee that i be getting both but most of my free time will surely occupied by bf3..
graphic/repetitive gameplay and for sure short storyline again would be major setback on mw3.. let alone the multiplayer still im thinking that cod 4 mw is the best and balance.

what about those with poor rigs like me? i cant play Battlefield 3, and i dont like modern warfare 3 graphics.


I will just stick with dota XP

I'll probably stick to BF3 like glue, so MW3, will only get if i can get a 40USD copy.

or wait for dota 2. that or u can move to TF2

Ima choose mw3 over bf 3 ..

For the last time, your rig isnt shit. Geez.

And i am not expecting to see you on BF3 anyway.

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Sep 4 2011, 04:45 PM

Trade my rig with mine...I guaranteed u can play Dota at Very High settings and I can play BF3 with ur rig for Very High settings too.. Win-Win situation

Yeay for " win-win "

POOR RIG LIKE YOU? POOR RIG LIKE YOU!!?

I'll choose not to choose.

Picking both up

totally bf3, bf3 ftw!

Bullshit, played BF3 and i'd say its not as thrilling as MW series. Soundtrack is weak. And i'm not talking about multiplayer. There no point including multiplayer into my equation. I played BF3 til mission Kaffarov and honestly, i'm getting bored.

Maybe you should try the multiplayer, but if you prefer single player over multiplayer, then Call of Duty is the game for you..

But really, Battlefield single player campaign is really weak compared to Call of Duty, they focus more on multiplayer....I also think that the single player campaign of BF3 is kinda boring, although it is somehow different from bad Company 2 and BF3 single player has some elements of Call of Duty...

play the multiplayer for more awesomeness...

Bf3 awesomeness is its multiplayer mode. Its the best multiplayer warfare game out there at the moment.

If you actually read the article properly, they're mentioning about bf3 's multiplayer mode and not its single player campaign.

As for single player no doubt mw will take the trophy, for now.

I rather they focus on improving their multiplayer awesomeness rather than the single player mode for no one gives that mich crap about it

This post has been edited by ExCrIpT: Nov 1 2011, 02:05 AM

This article is like a few weeks old.....

That said, SP is just as equally important as multiplay in a game. If you are going to do a half past 6 job on SP, pls dun even do it.

i'll play both.

bf3 becoz COD no innovation.. played all the COD series.. and it was meh.... nothing special... n get bored quite fast.. n i bet this MW3 will bore me to death... sorry COD.. not gonna touch this title till their developer wake up..

I played both BF3 and MW3...one conclusion, all the nub campers are flooding MW3 which is a good news for BF3 players who are more teamplayers.

*I'm a MW veteran player and I think its fair for me to say enough is enough for CampFare3...

MW3 is somewhat disappointing , graphics are really the same as MW2 .

in my opinion.i prefer battlefield 3.the multiplayer is better than MW3.but MW3 campaign can't beat Battlefield 3.and i heard that MW3 a lot of campers and battlefield 3 all teamwork players.

Playing both now.

SP: BF3's campaign story feels a bit ho-hum. Lost interest halfway. MW3 is a bit more action packed and engaging, but still is the same formula since MW1. Wish they're both more open ended like Crisis instead of me needing to "Follow" somebody all over the map.

MP: Playing as a pubber.
BF3 is much more engaging when it comes to teamplay. Downside is that in most games, one team will usually get steamrolled and spawn camped. Hard to find even games.

MW3 you'll get more closely contested games, faster paced. But plenty of lonewolf running around with akimbo guns blazing. Teamwork? Not much. Not much chatting too.

MW3 still looks similar to previous MW games, but for some reason, does not runs as smooth as BF3.

cod mw3 higher spec than battlefield 3 ....some people cant play battlefield3

As for me, I don't have much free time for gaming and just play occasionally.
A game like bf3 is more like a team player and require intense strategy and slow-paced which is the opposite of what we get in mw3.

I'd more prefer to play mw3 for the fast-paced, adrenaline pumping action and quick kill just to loosen up my stress from a long day of work.
This game is also more intuitive, easy to learn and I don't have problem with camper as they're more prone to get shot compared to a running player..

It's all bow down to personal choice..
Doesn't matter if you like bf3 or mw3, we're still united as a community of online gamer...

Like mw3..like battlefield 3 also..but mw3 grafik is nicer 4me..

i just wasted usd59.99 on this game.. sigh

im a fan of both. althogh i hate that ghost died at mw2.