Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Calling all LYN Healthcare Professionals, and people who are sick...

views
     
Blofeld
post Mar 22 2012, 11:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,700 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(drthein71 @ Sep 11 2011, 07:43 AM)
A good thread here.....
Name: drthein71
Designation: Physician and Gastroenterologist
Area of interest : internal medicine, Gastroenterology,endoscopy,hepatology

Can pm me if required   smile.gif
*
Hi Drthein71,

After surfing the internet and suspected to have gallstones, hence, I went for an ultrasound at BP Health Lab. What they found was 4 polyps. The biggest is 3mm x 3mm. Doctor said nothing can be done at the moment and need to go for a regular check up. A surgery is recommended if the polyps got bigger than 1cm.

My symptoms were dull aches on upper abdomen with slight fever occassionally once in a while. That symptom started about three months ago. Once, I had a diarrhea for five days, which I find it unusual. Not sure whether this is due to polyps or food poisoning. But that diarrhea triggers me to go for an ultrasound a couple of weeks back. Doctor said polyps usually don't cause problems and doctor said it may be due to some other problems. Historically, I'm also suffering from gastric problem.

I took a blood test too.

I'm underweight but surprisingly my bad cholesterol level is high. I don't eat much anyway.
Total cholesterol = 4.9
Tryglycerides = 0.5
HDL = 1.5
LDL = 3.1
Total Cholesterol = 3.2

Questions I would like to ask:
1. Is polyps caused by fatty food?
2. Is the high LDL the main culprit for polyps?
3. What can I do to stop the polyps from getting bigger?
4. What can I do to avoid having gallstones and polyps?
5. Or any advice you would like to give, I would be happy to hear. Thanks.


This post has been edited by Blofeld: Mar 23 2012, 12:13 AM
Blofeld
post Apr 3 2012, 11:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,700 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(queenc @ Apr 3 2012, 03:49 PM)
100kv 2mAs
is pretty good to me..
they are practicing high kV technique thus they can lower the time  of exposure to the patient
if you work to any government xray department ; for normal exposure for chest xray , is around 64kVp 4mAs

1 more thing ,
normal xray examination will not / very very low posibilities to cause any harm.
*
I'm not a doctor but I agree with queenc.

I remember being told by my doctor that the higher the radiation dose, the clearer the x-ray image will be. Can't remember if I hear that correctly.

Correct me if I'm wrong, I remember reading somewhere that taking one chest x-ray is equivalent to being exposed to background radiation for one month. In fact, we are being exposed to radiation every single day. The more dangerous thing is the CT scan. Instead, the chest x-ray doesn't really pose any harm at all.

There was once I took a digital chest x-ray (that's the term that I was told, which contain a lower radiation dose) at a private hospital. As a result, my doctor was having some hard time reading and comparing the x-ray because it was not as clear as another earlier x-ray which I took at a government hospital which has a much clearer image.

This post has been edited by Blofeld: Apr 3 2012, 11:45 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0152sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 12:31 PM