Humanities Why aren't human civilization not consider as part, of nature?
|
|
 Aug 29 2011, 12:04 AM, updated 15y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
245 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Malaysia  
|
human civilization as in big huge city and buildings, cars that produce pollutants, or even nuclear bombs. Not to forget synthetic products and machines and so on.
why aren't these considered as part of nature? whereas a simple beaver dam is consider as nature. A beaver dam is beavers habitat made from logs. |
|
|
Sep 9 2011, 01:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
245 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Malaysia
|
QUOTE(Benjamin911 @ Sep 8 2011, 11:40 PM) You are comparing the "Build Environment" to the "Natural Environment". why is it different?Both are obviously different. Regards.  what human do is also part of the nature. so it should be part of nature no matter or destructive it is. natural disasters are destructive and it is consider as nature |
| Change to: |  0.0168sec
 0.49
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 04:53 PM |
Quote