QUOTE(kparam77 @ Aug 29 2011, 06:13 PM)
Rm120,000 will be taxed...Public Mutual v3, Public/PB series funds
Public Mutual v3, Public/PB series funds
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 01:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(moon yuen @ Aug 30 2011, 02:00 PM) I bought PDSF (select dividend fund) at average cost of RM 0.32 few months back , now ITS RM 0.26XX. 1) it is a bond fund, not the same with PSDF you invested.Yesterday, I invest some $$ into Public stregic bond fund. 1) Is this a good fund ? What public mutual fund / NOT public mutual fund u recommended ? 2) My agent tell me to pump more $$ in PDSF ? but, I m quite reluctant to do so since it is already loss... 3) what should I do on this fund ? Hold on ? Invest more ? 4) Is it possible to save on the 5.5% service charge or discounted ? And its annual fees. Thanks 2) Agent, majority I encountered generally tell client to pump more money disregard what kind of situation you are facing one. It is your money, you decide your own, and listen to your own. Fund price fluctuating is quite norm due to market condition. 3) Dividend fund generally is quite steady and performing well over the long term. Whether hold, or invest more, this kind of question only yourself can answer. Investment is all about one's wilingness to take the risk. 4) For other fund run by other fund house, it is possible to get 2.5% service charge if sum is large enough whereby some broker, banks can give such a discount, but for PM fund, I am not sure it can or not. Annual fee is fixed, nothing you can do. |
|
|
Aug 30 2011, 03:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2012, 11:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(leekk8 @ Jan 10 2012, 01:37 PM) DDI is a wise choice, but it's not the best, definitely. DDI is to average your buying price, but not necessary pulling down your buying price. DDI is suitable for people who has not much time to monitor the market and wish to force her/himself to save some money. It might prevent you from investing big lump sum when market is high, but not help you to earn the most. Just to add/correct.DDI is a wise choice, for sure for agent. DDI is a wise choice for unit trust investors, provided the fund is performing and will be performing. DDI is bad choice, if the fund is not performing and not going to perform in the future as well. It sink one into deeper loss and greater risk, and greater loss. There is not foolproof strategy, nor which strategy is better or wise. Added on January 12, 2012, 11:20 amJust don't want any newbie in investment, has the wrong mindset, DDI is a must or a foolproof strategy. They need to know the pro and con of DDI. Not intend to encourage or discourage people to do DDI. This post has been edited by cherroy: Jan 12 2012, 11:20 AM |
|
|
Feb 1 2012, 04:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(desertkids @ Feb 1 2012, 11:46 AM) everybody oso cn buy islamic fund..unit trust is for long tern, mean min 3 years..i tink u shud jz buy it less than 1 year so u onli c it mk loss..be patient n doing DDI monthly..u wil c ur return slowly in coming years. min 3 years? btw got public mutual select fund?are u sure? buy less than 1 year? will see return in coming years? The fund (China Select) was launched around 2007, now 2012, almost 5 years already. What is the NAV now vs its initial launched NAV? There is no such thing long term must make money, 3 years can make money, more than 1 year can see the return. |
|
|
Feb 1 2012, 05:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(desertkids @ Feb 1 2012, 04:56 PM) if who say doing investment sure untung then they definitely bullshit u!!! Then previous this statement is bullsh#t ? Do u tink a market will keep on going down for 3 years & above? Joking only. QUOTE(desertkids @ Feb 1 2012, 11:46 AM) everybody oso cn buy islamic fund..unit trust is for long tern, mean min 3 years..i tink u shud jz buy it less than 1 year so u onli c it mk loss..be patient n doing DDI monthly..u wil c ur return slowly in coming years. Market will keep on going down for 3 years above?Market cannot down for more than 3 years? Nikkei has been going down for more than 20 years until now. S&P 500 after 10 year still making a loss until now. Nasdaq only 50% of its 2000 dotcom bubble. China SSEC from 2000 until 2006 did not make a gain. Not to mention 10 years of 1.5% management fee already can mean nearly 12~15 gone even if without the fund making a loss. This post has been edited by cherroy: Feb 1 2012, 05:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2012, 05:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(skiddtrader @ Feb 1 2012, 05:12 PM) WOW! I thought only for a limited time after the initial investment. Every year charge 1 ~ 1.5% management fee based on NAV, disregards how the fund is perform, active or non-active.So you mean to say as long as I'm always putting my money into the fund, the agent also got a cut for as long as I stay invested? I'm tempted to ask my siblings to stop their contributions so that they don't pay to a useless agent that don't service them at all. Maybe they can exit and re-enter with a different agent. Management fee is solely go to the fund house. Agent won't get a slice from the management fee, they only got a slice of commission from the initial charge that can range from 1~5%. |
|
|
Feb 2 2012, 12:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(desertkids @ Feb 1 2012, 05:40 PM) actually im nt againts cherroy de, im oso totally agree wat he saying bout. I not mean to scare. tat is no guarranty return in investment! hw 2 say leh..his statement is gud for potential investor to not listen to those agents that say guarranty return.. bt at da other side his statement oso scare up many potential investor cz even i read da statement i oso think my investment most probably goto deep sea.. Stock market make a lot people richer, so does UT. Just I am against sales kind statement, you buy this UT, 3 year or 5 years from now, you will make money. It gives wrong impression and expectation to uninformed investors. If after 5 years cannot make money or making a loss of 30%, how? Agent got compensate the loss? Then the investor knock the agent door, and ask you told me it will make money after 3 to 5 years one. Added on February 2, 2012, 12:13 am QUOTE(kparam77 @ Feb 1 2012, 09:14 PM) if we c the asset allocation from 2008..... You need to dig deeper. The asset allocation decrease in MM, can be due to withdraw of money from MM to invest in more equities or due to redemption. Both also can contribute rise in equity portion and reduce in MM portion.equity: 2008 - 84.7% 2009 - 93.4% 2010 - 94.2% as at oct 2011 - 88.16% MM: 2008 - 14.4% 2009 -6.6% 2010 - 5.8% as at oct 2011 - 11.84% so, looks like FM more confident abt the equity stocks in greater china region. they increaces the allocation every year and less in MM. slitly drop in 2011. i know some will say PM FM not good in china mrket. but why the FM increase/maintain the allocations? any reason? is it because, as per stated in prospectus..... The fund allows the investor the opportunity to participate in the long term growth potential of a diversified portfolio of blue chip stocks, growth stocks, fundamentaly undervalued stocks and dividedns stocks in the greater china region??? i think the undervalued stock still undervalued any idea? So assessment of FM must be correct by your definition? Why increase? It can be many many reason, They can feel more confidence, more bullish about the targeted stocks. Undervalued? Today undervalued can become overvalued due to fundamental change. Again you need to dig deeper into their portfolio to see. I also cannot comment much as I don't study the fund. Don't get me wrong, I don't mean the fund is good or bad. This post has been edited by cherroy: Feb 2 2012, 12:13 AM |
|
|
Feb 2 2012, 09:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(desertkids @ Feb 2 2012, 08:44 AM) same thing goes here..if u say my statement above mislead ppl UT can guaranty return after 3 to 5 years.. My statement is always, UT or whatever investment can make you a loss, also can make you huge gain.then from your statement above oso mislead ppl UT wont mk return n will keep losing no matter how many years.. (if im a new n not so confident investor, after read our post jz now..i wil tink desertkids is a bullshit agent & all PM agent oso cheating them cz i tink a lot agent will mention about long term investment in UT, so better tk out my money from UT now) If a agent mislead a customer to select a non performance fund & cheat him will get return in 3-5 years, then its agent fault not me. my previous statement just want to state out 1 thing. that is i duno will UT gv u a guaranty return in hw many years. BUT its for long term investment, v r investor dun easy get panic whenever c the market fall or rise, bt mz use some fundamental anaylysis & switching technique. I just offer opposite view and pointed out there were/are investment cannot even make you a gain even after 3 years, 5years or even 10 years. Long term or not doesn't guarantee an investment will make money, or make a loss. I use the word, "can", instead of "will". See the difference. |
|
|
Feb 10 2012, 09:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(cracksys @ Feb 10 2012, 09:47 AM) QuickQ. If there is a fund can give 12% guaranteed return, you will see people Q overnight and a few 10 miles long. i was offered a package called Public Mutual Saving Fund and told that i'll get on average 12% per year which will be paid twice a year (effectively 6% per cycle) my principal would not be affected by nose-jump price decrement. it will be similar to saving account, whereby after 3 months, i'll be able to withdraw my cash anytime i want. legit? Probably what you had been told is past year performance. Past performance doesn't guarantee future will be the same or not. As quoted from Public Mutual website. http://www.publicmutual.com.my/LinkClick.a...MQ%3d&tabid=103 Public Saving fund is an equities type of fund. Initial service charge is 5.5% Annual management fee is 1.5%. It is not saving account. This post has been edited by cherroy: Feb 10 2012, 10:02 AM |
|
|
Feb 11 2012, 04:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(justanovice @ Feb 11 2012, 02:50 PM) Well since I do not know anything at all when I buy UT last time, can I ask these questions: 1. The fund will buy back whenever investors want to redeem.1) In stock market, there should be a willing buyer for the stocks I have. In UT, if I want to sell according to the latest NAV, who is the buyer? The fund Mgt? How does sales / buy impact NAV? 2) Is there any charges when I sell. I noticed when I buy I am charged 5.x% 3) I read this thread, seems there is a 1.5% charge fee annually? Is it on my total invested value? Thanks to all. 2. No 3. 1.5% has been charged daily from the fund NAV, (the amount is not noticeable for most investors as 1.5% being charged over the year on the NAV), so whatever you have sold/redeem is based on the NAV pricing. 1.5% annual management is charged based on the NAV pricing, disregarding your invested value (but when you invested time, you invested on NAV value +5.%). NAV is changing constantly every market day due to their value of the portfolio. |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 02:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(kparam77 @ Apr 3 2012, 12:37 PM) not sure abt foreign stock. Incorrect.ya, its not mean all the stock price is high. u need to do a proper study to find out which is cheap. Eventhought the PE is lower compare to 1997, its look like market is lower. but i dont think its realy low because the KLCI market cap now is abt RM1.2trilion. i believe the market cap shud be lower in 1997 to show the PE is higher. correct me if i wrong. PER is about earning. Corporate earning is way higher than 1997. The total profit made by listed company in KLSE is also way higher than prior 1997. So it is totally irrelevant to say market cap should be lower or higher as compared to 1997. Market cap also depended on number of listed company as compared to their paid up capital, or share issued. Added on April 3, 2012, 2:34 pm1600 points doesn't means it is high or expensive, nor 1000 must be low or cheap. Index should go higher and higher if a country economy is progressing which lead to better corporate profit across. There is no such thing of index should stay at what level, or 1600 must be expensive. Index or market is depended on corporate business profitability. This post has been edited by cherroy: Apr 3 2012, 02:34 PM |
|
|
Apr 6 2012, 04:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(JeffreyYap @ Apr 6 2012, 10:42 AM) Invest in UT, you never need to look at the distribution. Distribution is meaningless to investors. It is all about NAV increment solely. You only need to watch the NAV movement, got distribution or not, make no different. Any distribution come from the NAV, whatever gain, profit, dividend received by the fund is already being reflected in NAV increment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2012, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(felixwang @ Apr 6 2012, 04:14 PM) Since you are agency manager or unit trust consultant, then please at least answer or give advice to fellow forumer that ask the question that what he/she should do with a 45% loss in a fund.Instead keep on posting "Please consult your UTC". QUOTE(syy @ Apr 6 2012, 03:32 PM) This post has been edited by cherroy: Apr 6 2012, 04:37 PM |
|
|
Apr 6 2012, 05:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(felixwang @ Apr 6 2012, 04:40 PM) assuming "distribution" is not important... and assuming you have invested in our oldest fund, Public Savings Fund from day 1, 29th March, 1981 at RM 1.0000/unit with a ONE OFF LUMP SUM investment of RM 100,000. As of yesterday, 5th April, 2012, the PSF NAV/unit is at RM 0.5738, how much do you think you will have with Public Mutual as of yesterday based on your investment 31 years ago? If there is no distribution, the NAV will be at elevated level/price. The net worth of owning the PSF without distribution (a elevated NAV without distribution) = net worth of distribution accumulated + current NAV. Added on April 6, 2012, 5:30 pmAs consultant, please at least give some advice on fellow forumer enquiry. As a consultant, what you can post is "please consult your UTC"? As a consultant, you are asking me back question, tell me to provide details of the fund, when I am noob in unit trust, nor a person in this industry? This post has been edited by cherroy: Apr 6 2012, 05:32 PM |
|
|
Apr 7 2012, 12:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(felixwang @ Apr 6 2012, 06:27 PM) 3 reasons, a. Since other cannot comment other than UTC, then this topic should be closed?a. I am asking the question because, with great confidence, you guys have given an alternate answer to unit trust "distribution" based on very little knowledge in unit trust. Eventhough your intention means well, but it is not advisable to provide answers or advises to others when you are not a licensed UTC. More often than not, you will do more damages than good. Hence, I have requested you guys to consult your licensed UTC about your conclusion towards UT distribution. b. In the case where your UTC is not able to provide you with a satisfactory answer, unless the UTC you are attached with right now is your relatives or loves one, I do not see the reason why you should continue to engage his/her services if he/she is incompetant. c. To invest in UT, is similar to engaging a professional to managing and growing your asset. If you are doing this on your own, why would you be paying your UTC of such high service charge? Are you aware that your UTC is getting paid for as long as you stay invested with the Unit Trust Management Company? Yes, we are talking about a perpetually paid commission on a monthly basis on your expences when you are the one who are doing all the hard work based on your own limited knowledges. Well, I am the one who is supposed to ask you "what are you doing?" instead of the otherway around. Added on April 6, 2012, 6:29 pm You took the words right out of my mouth, well said! For those who wishes to learn more about the fundamentals of unit trust, you are welcome to join us as a Unit Trust Consultant. The training will only takes 3-4 weeks, where you will be undergoing UTC Basic Training Program that comes in 5 modules. Become a UTC, start managing your own funds and enjoy more than 50% savings on the service charge! For more information pertaining to our training, you are welcome to forward me your contact number @ 012 277 1025 and I will be in touch with you asap! I look forward to hearing from you guys! Thank you and kind regards, Felix Wang Agency Manager Public Mutual Berhad |
|
|
Apr 7 2012, 12:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(mypetridish @ Apr 6 2012, 10:40 PM) it is in the contract that UTCs signed. So, below is a form of promoting themselves? also, UTCs cannot have any website promoting themselves, including blog about finance with their name as the owner of the blog. you cant promote selling Public Mutual on the internet, period. get a copy of the contact/signing form from any UTC and read it through. if you see any UTCs (not just the ones from Public Mutual) promoting themselves online, please report it to FIMM. QUOTE(felixwang @ Apr 6 2012, 06:27 PM) For those who wishes to learn more about the fundamentals of unit trust, you are welcome to join us as a Unit Trust Consultant. The training will only takes 3-4 weeks, where you will be undergoing UTC Basic Training Program that comes in 5 modules. Become a UTC, start managing your own funds and enjoy more than 50% savings on the service charge! For more information pertaining to our training, you are welcome to forward me your contact number @ 012 277 1025 and I will be in touch with you asap! I look forward to hearing from you guys! Thank you and kind regards, Felix Wang Agency Manager Public Mutual Berhad Added on April 7, 2012, 12:08 amAs well as the signature? QUOTE INTERESTED IN CREATING AN ALTERNATE SOURCE OF INCOME?, you are welcome to join us as a registered Unit Trust Consultant. For more information, do visit our website at http://www.publicmutual.com.my or contact me at 012 277 1025 with no obligation This post has been edited by cherroy: Apr 7 2012, 12:08 AMFelix Wang, Agency Manager, Unit Trust Consultant Million Dollar Producer, 2010 Million Dollar Producer, 2011 22nd National Sales Convention, NSC Trip Qualifier, 2010 23rd National Sales Convention, NSC Trip Qualifier, 2011 |
|
|
Apr 7 2012, 02:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(mypetridish @ Apr 7 2012, 08:50 AM) So you mean we cannot have any advice and comment from UTC online or in the forum, all they posted are recruiting only?While others being labelled as very little knowledge, being advised not to give any answer or comment, as not a licensed UTC, so cannot post as well? So we are waiting your advice this topic should be closed or not? As UTC cannot post, outsiders also being advised not to post. QUOTE(felixwang @ Apr 6 2012, 06:27 PM) a. I am asking the question because, with great confidence, you guys have given an alternate answer to unit trust "distribution" based on very little knowledge in unit trust. Eventhough your intention means well, but it is not advisable to provide answers or advises to others when you are not a licensed UTC. More often than not, you will do more damages than good. Hence, I have requested you guys to consult your licensed UTC about your conclusion towards UT distribution. |
|
|
Apr 8 2012, 12:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(g1bber @ Apr 8 2012, 12:45 AM) It's kind of a grey area Are you sure?From what I understand, recruiting online is fine. Like, hey would you like to earn some extra $$ by working weekends or etc, etc ? I may have something you might be interested in. How bout you come over to so and so at so and so time... When it comes to promoting PM products, agents are only allowed to use material approved by PM. Even the name cards are standardized. Basically what my cousin who is also my upline stated it quite clearly, when meeting with a prospective client you MUST show two things: your FIMM card and the master prospectus, which basically requires us to meet them face to face. Also any transaction cannot be done in cash. I guess these rules are in place to protect both the agent and the prospect/client. So in theory, I think, sure I can give advice in forums or by phone to people whom aren't my clients as long as I don't stand to benefit from it, ie I don't get commission. However if I do get commission, ie he becomes my client, I am required to first meet up and show my card and make sure they read the master prospectus first and be informed of whatever I am required to disclose by PM as stated in by code of conduct. Something like that lah Then again, most agents are basically salesmen. I dropped my agent and became an agent myself to take control of my family's investments. I've seen with my own eyes how these CONsultants go around chasing commission without care about the clients This is where moral hazard comes in, but than again, I think all industries have these sort of people, it's just human nature. I think I may be missing a point here and I've worded what I think a bit poorly, so feel free to correct me, thank you We have contradicting statement now. QUOTE(mypetridish @ Apr 6 2012, 06:02 PM) |
|
|
Apr 24 2012, 05:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Staff
25,802 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
QUOTE(mzzzk8819 @ Apr 24 2012, 05:24 PM) hi.. Nobody can give you an answer.I have KWSP 100k. if I invest some amount of my KWSP money to Public Mutual. how much percentages of dividend I will get ? how about risk? normally KWSP give 6% pa dividend with no risk. Please advices.. thanks UT can make money or lose money as well. It can be 10%, it can be -10% as well, all depended on investment or specifically stock/bond market condition. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0225sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 10:37 AM |