TRUE and FALSE.
Please don't forget that the ECU reads the signal from the TPS to compute the "Load". It's not about how far/deep you depress the accelerator pedal, but how fast you depress the pedal.
Look at these hypothetical graphs: -
(no intention to promote anything but this is all I have)

Take SP7 mode as example, the slope of the graph is greater than 'Nor' (unmodified signal). This slope is interpreted by the ECU as 'rate'. Greater the rate, higher 'load' the ECU reads.
Higher load = more ignition advance = better performance = better throttle response = faster acceleration.
Can you achieve the same result without an ETC? Technically YES.
Case study:
In SP7, it takes 50% lesser accelerator depression to achieve 100% (check graph above). If time is factored into the the X-axis, and you depress the accelerator 2x quicker, you can get the ECU into reading the same 'load', but your foot also need to work faster.
If 'throttle response' is a sensation of the relation between your foot work and the engine behaviour, then, working faster with your foot DOESN'T make the throttle more responsive.
Electronic throttle control is actually part of BMW i-drive, or other similar system that regulates the rate of throttle pedal depression.
Honda CR-Z has the same system built-in, just FYI.
Added on November 4, 2011, 1:46 pmBut don't trust me in this. I am a business person and I am always bias.
Do your own study, but try to understand what I am trying to tell, first.
This post has been edited by drexchan: Nov 4 2011, 01:48 PM
Nov 4 2011, 01:42 PM
Quote



0.0210sec
0.29
6 queries
GZIP Disabled