msi k7n2 delta 2 bo3 bios
bigwater cooling.
AMD ATHLON XP (DESKTOP BARTON) - SPEEDRANKING, ALL, Unlock? Problems? Ocability? Settings?
AMD ATHLON XP (DESKTOP BARTON) - SPEEDRANKING, ALL, Unlock? Problems? Ocability? Settings?
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 11:20 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
326 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ |
msi k7n2 delta 2 bo3 bios
bigwater cooling. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 11:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
326 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ |
QUOTE(evildonkey @ Mar 3 2005, 10:59 AM) tat just proved ure current overclock is not stable yet and prime stable doesn't mean it's 3d stable....to define a total stable overclock, u need to pass all 3 prime95, memtest86+ and 3dmark2001...btw i found a program call SNM which can detects error for both cpu and mem faster than prime/sp2004 and memtest...it also stresses ure cpu more and the temp shoots higher and faster compared to prime...u can give it a try if u need something to stress the cpu and mem faster b4 u go for a 24hours stressing running prime. Excellent suggestions evildonkey thanks. try running sp2004 small fft test with priority 10 for 24hours to test ure cpu stability run memtest86+ with test #5 for 8 hours for ure ram stability and running 2dmark2001 with real time runtime (go to ure windows task manager, click on the processes tab and sekect 3dmark2001.exe and right click, select priority and select real time) if u can pass all the criterias above then u'll have a 99% stable overclock anyway it's something i read over in ocforums and applies to only those that go for a totally stable overclock...you can actually consider ure setup stable if u can play games for hours long but fail prime as soon as it starts....everyone has their own defination of a stable overclock depending on their needs p/s: u might wanna check ure gfx if it's overclocked since it's a problem occured during gaming Yes i gathered that the comp isn't totally stable the moment i started hanging playing games =]. i'm going under the assumption u mean to run the 3 tests seperately and not together right heh heh. Anyway for me if i can't get the overclock to run at all the things i do then its not good enough for me. To minimise the changes i have kept my fx5700 at stock with no overclocking. so kinda strange that way. that it still hangs. So what do u suppose could possibly be the issue here? gfx problem? Thanks for the input! |
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 01:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
541 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: peejay |
try and lower ure overclock and test using 3dmark
btw wat test did u ran on sp2004?? |
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 02:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
303 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: Nilai, Negeri Sembilan |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 03:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
326 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ |
QUOTE(evildonkey @ Mar 3 2005, 01:08 PM) O/c at 2.3 gig is fine210x11 at default voltage game for over an hour then i realised i had to work the next day haha. ran with large inplace fft or something like that. seeing as 3d gaming mucks up wonder if its safe to increase a little to the agp voltage...hmmm.... |
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 03:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
326 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 03:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
what's the highest vcore i can go for a barton2500? i tried 1.8V for 133x18, run sisoft sandra. when i return home after some time, my pc restarted. wat's the problem?
barton2500 nf7 256x2 khx pc2700 |
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 03:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
541 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: peejay |
try running 11x220 in memtest86+ with test #5 for 2-3 hours to see if ure mem is limiting you or not...if it's not then try upping ure vcore to 1.85 or 1.9 if u dare to try...if tat still doesn't work then i believe ure proc had reached its limit...u could try a slight bump on the vdd and vagp and see if it helps
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 04:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
ok, will tell u the results.
QUOTE(evildonkey @ Mar 3 2005, 03:56 PM) try running 11x220 in memtest86+ with test #5 for 2-3 hours to see if ure mem is limiting you or not...if it's not then try upping ure vcore to 1.85 or 1.9 if u dare to try...if tat still doesn't work then i believe ure proc had reached its limit...u could try a slight bump on the vdd and vagp and see if it helps |
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 04:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
541 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: peejay |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 05:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
326 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: PJ |
QUOTE(evildonkey @ Mar 3 2005, 03:56 PM) try running 11x220 in memtest86+ with test #5 for 2-3 hours to see if ure mem is limiting you or not...if it's not then try upping ure vcore to 1.85 or 1.9 if u dare to try...if tat still doesn't work then i believe ure proc had reached its limit...u could try a slight bump on the vdd and vagp and see if it helps pity if its the limit of the proc... sighs.though i can still run windows normally at 2.5 gig but as usual craps out at gaming haha well i'll try these few other things out and see. thanks alot buddy! |
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 08:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
541 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: peejay |
i can boot into windows with 2.4gig on 1.95v but woudn't pass prime no matter wat voltage i feed it...i even tried feeding it with 2.1v but still no go...anything above tat kenot boot into windows addi
|
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 06:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 07:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,672 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 10:40 AM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
the best way to quick-stress your cpu is by putting 64K min, 512K max, in-place FFT, each FFT run for 5mins.
64K fits the L1 cache (x2), 512K fits the L2 cache. btw... i'll be soon joining the rank. just waiting for my DTR Athlon XP |
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 10:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
541 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: peejay |
QUOTE(cubchai @ Mar 4 2005, 06:17 AM) don't know how to use memtest. so with 200x11, i tested with sisofy sandra. got error. see attachment. increase ure vcore another notch |
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 01:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Mar 4 2005, 07:03 AM) no idea.QUOTE(soulfly @ Mar 4 2005, 10:40 AM) the best way to quick-stress your cpu is by putting 64K min, 512K max, in-place FFT, each FFT run for 5mins. ok will try. burn few hours again?64K fits the L1 cache (x2), 512K fits the L2 cache. btw... i'll be soon joining the rank. just waiting for my DTR Athlon XP QUOTE(evildonkey @ Mar 4 2005, 10:52 AM) tried wit 1.85vcore. failed when i do folding. that's y now i use other stress test. cos i always failed doing a work unit. |
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 02:17 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
231 posts Joined: Sep 2004 |
QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Mar 3 2005, 12:36 AM) My new CPU, same as tone's stepping. Using KT333 pump voltage..overclock the bugger la...no need to test default one la.. Tone, can yours prime stable on that vcore and speed? just wondering.... EDIT: It's stable now. Don't know why....lol dont pamper the proc ...hit it hard! ... keep us updated...go david! tone.. |
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 02:41 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
cubchai,
i would prefer CPU Burn-in tool for burn in. I only use SP2004/Prime95 for stability/stress testing |
|
|
Mar 4 2005, 02:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
322 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
QUOTE(soulfly @ Mar 4 2005, 02:41 PM) cubchai, i'm trying sp2004 too. but dunno how to use it, in fact most of the software for stress/stability test. really dunno wat's the problem. someone once told me that maybe the problem came from the RAM. Once again my spec.i would prefer CPU Burn-in tool for burn in. I only use SP2004/Prime95 for stability/stress testing amd barton2500 abit nf7 khx256x2 ddr 333 |
| Change to: | 0.0286sec
0.82
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 02:28 PM |