Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

RPG Diablo III v2, Q2 2012

views
     
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Aug 9 2011, 11:03 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(hfi @ Aug 9 2011, 12:38 AM)
Your weariness is warranted but I don;t think they going towards an mmo monthly sub format, but towards somekind of free to play format. Think of Guild Wars, Lotro and now Age of Conan. All of those titles do it differently but the idea is to charge one time for a copy of the game, and then introduce extra features i.e. quests, zones, cosmetic changes, items, skills etc through expansions or some sort of DLC packs. I do not think they will charge monthly sub for D3 simply because it's in their best interest to have their gamers to play all of their games. They wouldn't want their gamers to be choosing to play either D3 or WoW. It's already a huge commitment just to play them, let alone paying subs for them.
*
Why don't just call it Diablo 3 MMORPG and be done with it.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Aug 9 2011, 11:38 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


QUOTE(khelben @ Aug 9 2011, 11:33 AM)

How to call it "Diablo 3 MMORPG" when it's not an MMORPG? laugh.gif
*
It bark like a dog, it bite like a dog, it's a dog, even if you name it Cat.
SUSMrUbikeledek
post Aug 10 2011, 08:35 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


The day when a single or small group of programmers can create a computer game in their spare time is long over. Now, creating a proper video game is long and expensive task. it involved hundreds if not thousands of people working full time. More so now that Blizzard is a corporate body with a board of shareholders, most of which i believe never play any game beyond solitaire. So go figure.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0388sec    0.52    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 07:35 PM