Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
What features you like most in a social network?, For example: microblogging, live chat...
|
TSJeffrey1987
|
Aug 2 2011, 04:54 AM
|
|
QUOTE(HoNeYdEwBoY @ Aug 2 2011, 04:42 AM) @TS, I would prefer a plain and simple like google+, adding friend to circle. Unlike now, FB suck max ? even you not adding someone they block you as spamming and FB chat suck max too. Google + make a simple and light based without any games or extension on the web for now. maybe this is because they having something call "sharding" I have an account in Google + too. Really simple I can say. The circle system (in a simple way to say = filter system) is really good too  As for the apps, you personally think that it is not necessary for a social network?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSJeffrey1987
|
Aug 2 2011, 04:56 AM
|
|
QUOTE(SaintFire @ Aug 2 2011, 04:48 AM) social network should have a convenience button to your most visited porn site, and also automatically set your status to "offline" when you wanna get your fap on, not only that, a EXCELLENT social network should also inform you about similar porn searches you made, that would be fkn awesome id throw away my facebook account for one of those. Added on August 2, 2011, 4:50 amoh and social networks should also have an anonymous button where you can go and chat with fellow anon's randomly in a forum style page. I guess chatting with "strangers" in a social network in kinda on demand thingy now?  Perhaps a social network should have a virtual name (screen name) beside of real name (which you have the freedom to display or not)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
xelrix
|
Aug 2 2011, 07:21 AM
|
|
simple ui. like g+. and please, no customization of your profilepage/wall/whatever. this is why friendster is dead.
allow interactive commenting/sharing system. like, allow pictures in comments. extensive media support for sharing (gif, voice/sounds only, videos, pictures (unaltered. its ok to downscale pics for thumbnails but dont temper with the original pictures))
have an alternate, optimized interface for mobile devices. easy mobile sharing.
NO EXCESSIVE CENSORSHIP AND MODERATION. f*** fb. i hate it how those moderating staff can ban accounts whenever they feel like it. i hate how they stop me from sharing a vid because they deemed them spammy. i hate how they stop me from adding friends because my behaviour was botlike. i hate how i have to wait another oh-how-many-hours before i could change my name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSJeffrey1987
|
Aug 2 2011, 01:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(xelrix @ Aug 2 2011, 07:21 AM) simple ui. like g+. and please, no customization of your profilepage/wall/whatever. this is why friendster is dead. allow interactive commenting/sharing system. like, allow pictures in comments. extensive media support for sharing (gif, voice/sounds only, videos, pictures (unaltered. its ok to downscale pics for thumbnails but dont temper with the original pictures)) have an alternate, optimized interface for mobile devices. easy mobile sharing. NO EXCESSIVE CENSORSHIP AND MODERATION. f*** fb. i hate it how those moderating staff can ban accounts whenever they feel like it. i hate how they stop me from sharing a vid because they deemed them spammy. i hate how they stop me from adding friends because my behaviour was botlike. i hate how i have to wait another oh-how-many-hours before i could change my name. "allow interactive commenting/sharing system. like, allow pictures in comments. extensive media support for sharing (gif, voice/sounds only, videos, pictures (unaltered. its ok to downscale pics for thumbnails but dont temper with the original pictures))" - this is similar to forum which we can add links, quotation, attachments, videos and etc in replying a comment
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSJeffrey1987
|
Aug 3 2011, 12:14 PM
|
|
Oh yea, do you guys think that video chatting is necessary for a social network?
|
|
|
|
|