Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Model Kits Gundam & Mecha Modelling Thread V21

views
     
pinako
post Jul 17 2011, 07:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
28 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Shah Alam
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jul 17 2011, 06:58 PM)
Alright boys and girls, enough with the "how to post in this thread" comments and back to gunpla please.
Some questions about the Amatsu:

1. Are the ankle joints flimsy? My Blue Frame's ankles are. And with the high heels, is it still as easy as the Red Frame (with flat feet) for standing poses?

2. Is the torso/waist joint strong enough to support the backpack? Again, my Blue Frame has the tendency to tilt backwards when the tactical arms is attached.

3. Still with the backpack - is it still attached via a single polycap joint? Blue Frame does, and no way can it support the weight of the tactical arms hence it sags downwards.

4. How about the head? Seems like there are many individual pieces that may be attached loosely. The Blue Frame's face armour tends to get knocked off easily, and the semicircular piece beneath the chin pops out if you rotate it too much.

5. And how about the other tiny pieces such as the red pieces on the thighs? My Blue Frame is the one that has most broken parts - right shoulder joint, the little orange pieces on the thighs, the hand pegs. doh.gif

As you can already tell, the 1/100 Blue Frame is full of flaws... Or maybe mine's a lemon?
Actually no, the RG Strike made me appreciate the MG version even more.

RG has too many unnecessary panel lines and it doesn't come with the catapult !
*
er..sorry but i'm confius with the review is it for blue frame or amatsu?

sorry just my 2 cent.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0454sec    0.73    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 05:23 PM