QUOTE(weikee @ Jul 17 2011, 12:49 AM)
In Malaysia,
Assume
#1 = Gas
#2 = Induction
#3 = Radiant
Running cost (in order)
#1, Gas is still cheaper, because is subsidized by government.
#2, Induction is good, because the transfer of heat are very efficient
#3, Radiant, transfer of heat are slow.
Usability
#1, can use most of the cooking pots, woks, pans, clay
#2, you can only use anything with steel, Iron and flat surface.
- But the market is getting more of pots and pans support induction. Even some claypot can support induction.
#3, Can use most of the pots, pans, clay as long is flat surface.
Efficient
#1, not so efficient
#2, is the best, boiling water is so much faster compare to gas or radiant.
#3, slow heat up. If your cooking time is short like fry egg, it waste lots of energy. Take time to heat up.
I personally still prefer gas, and 2nd choice is induction.
Good summarization Assume
#1 = Gas
#2 = Induction
#3 = Radiant
Running cost (in order)
#1, Gas is still cheaper, because is subsidized by government.
#2, Induction is good, because the transfer of heat are very efficient
#3, Radiant, transfer of heat are slow.
Usability
#1, can use most of the cooking pots, woks, pans, clay
#2, you can only use anything with steel, Iron and flat surface.
- But the market is getting more of pots and pans support induction. Even some claypot can support induction.
#3, Can use most of the pots, pans, clay as long is flat surface.
Efficient
#1, not so efficient
#2, is the best, boiling water is so much faster compare to gas or radiant.
#3, slow heat up. If your cooking time is short like fry egg, it waste lots of energy. Take time to heat up.
I personally still prefer gas, and 2nd choice is induction.
Initially was thinking of getting gas + radiant, but later thought of the running cost and hardware cost, finally decide to go for gas only.
This post has been edited by phoenix69: Jul 20 2011, 01:54 PM
Jul 20 2011, 01:49 PM

Quote
0.0148sec
0.46
6 queries
GZIP Disabled