its a super upgrade to me.

my frens selling his 85mm F1.4

---

Added on July 14, 2011, 11:51 pmerrr 3k lens meh? why canon mount 1.6k only? ><

---

Added on July 15, 2011, 12:16 amnikon 1.4d super soft~! not worth to pay extra. if u want extra and smooth bokeh ok. sigma better IMO. i dnt know about the new 1.8G one. good review on that even at wide open.

sori i dont have all the lens u mention but i got 50mm F1.4 nippon kogaku shoot at F2


This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jul 15 2011, 12:16 AM

its T* one.

its not flare, it just simple one big click of brush. it become nice when i print on album. the color also rander nicely when im print on album. yea i know on web abit sux but after i put on my layout, it just simply nice and my client love it~!

---

Added on July 15, 2011, 7:35 pmhere the real flare from the sun. no editing was apply. straight from camera resize and upload


This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jul 15 2011, 07:35 PM

want to ask u guys, is this lens sharp enuff to replace my 1870?

i got the lens but dont have the word nikon kogaku... >< why meh

mine got this wording only (pict taken with 50mm F1.4 AI


This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jul 16 2011, 02:12 AM

but still softer then the AI version at F1.4. F2.8 and above almost same sharp. >< budden this lens play video damn rock~! haha

to me, its quite important. at F1.4 i hardly can find the focus point or i dnt know how to use it. now i want to try film back. F55 looks like ready to be molest by me

retailed sure expensive. big company, bigger expenditure, bigger cost.

small company, less cost. they get also same from nikon also.

---

Added on July 16, 2011, 3:25 amfor my client menu~! rawr


This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jul 16 2011, 03:25 AM

sharp but lose some detail. here sample from 50mm f1.4 nipon kogaku. FYi, 50mm F1.4 Ai is sharper and 50mm1.4 AiS more sharper then Ai. mine is the less sharp one.

i thnk i already post this one but im gonna post this again
shot at F2. no editing just resize and crop only





This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jul 16 2011, 08:17 PM

as usual, spam dlu then read back to back haha



full story is at http://isepunyephoto.blogspot.com/2011/07/...engagement.html

if i was on ur shoe, ill take 2470 anytime. higher 2nd hand value (due to higher price) and easier to sell. ya lor not many DX user can afford to buy 1755 but im pretty sure most of FX user can afford 2470

in term of sharpness, i think both is almost the same. colors also almost same contrast. the only major differ is the range. both has top quality! both motors are fast!

do u have kitlens? if yes, try to limit urself untiil 24mm. shoot for couple of week. if u think that 24mm is wide enuff for ur usage, then there u go

tamron is a regretful choice. at the end i use more 1870 rather than 1750. and now more 2880 rather than 1870 ><

heyho just back from vacay~!! woot woot

---

Added on July 28, 2011, 3:31 amsome of sea view?

---

Added on July 28, 2011, 4:32 amphotos of bikinis candid shot~!


This post has been edited by Isepunye: Jul 28 2011, 04:32 AM

nice lens u using. im just using 116 for wide and takumar 200mm F5.6 for tele

fasting month is a challenging month to me~! sigh

As part of Kuala Lumpur Design Week Festival, this year we include Photography as one of the event component called WIRAFOTOFEST! In this event, there are 7 sub subject taking place. One of it which is the "competition" is offering over RM30,000 worth of prizes to be grab! Please pass this words around to all the photographic society!!!

VISIT www.kldesignweek.com for more info!!

what about this?

me 100% jpeg. never shoot raw lol

long time no post no sepam