Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Academic Research Thread, MPhil/PhD candidate/holder welcome!

views
     
tester
post Mar 24 2012, 05:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
379 posts

Joined: Sep 2004


QUOTE(lopo90 @ Mar 24 2012, 12:48 AM)
Hmm, I'm just wondering. Is it true that some people who are doing their thesis only take references that supports their research and not those that may be able to disprove their research?

That was what my lecturer told us during a lecture.
*
Is this the way they do things in Malaysia???

No... you should instead try to explain the observed differences between your results and others - why your results don't agree with others. Maybe they used different methodologies? What, then, are the merits of your methodologies and how your results can fit into the big picture (ie. the collective knowledge of your research topic so far).

This post has been edited by tester: Mar 24 2012, 05:15 PM
tester
post Apr 4 2012, 07:01 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
379 posts

Joined: Sep 2004


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 4 2012, 12:34 AM)
Well, most of the time people who do research will tend to find facts that support their theory/ objectives... everybody just loves positive results, don't they?  laugh.gif
A proper research should take into account all the positive/negative points of a particular topic/technology etc. prior to initiation of a project, which is why the planning and designing of a project is very important..

As for those biased thesis/papers focusing only on the positive side of the topic/technology etc., most of the time they won't get passed the reviewers (who are a whole lot more experienced in the field), especially for international papers  brows.gif
*
Being able to challenge and explain why others' results not agreeing with yours give so much more credibility to your research, providing that your data is solid enough. This is what science is about, after all.
tester
post Apr 28 2012, 03:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
379 posts

Joined: Sep 2004


QUOTE(LoveMeNot @ Apr 27 2012, 03:47 PM)
envied those who have started their PhD. Somehow I'm still lagging behind on this though I've been telling myself I will look for supervisor soon enough for ages. Either I'm lack of motivation, determination or I'm just plain coward.

Give me some kick in the ass guys!  cry.gif  cry.gif
*
Think of this: when you grow older the chances of you getting a PhD decreases significantly because of the changes in your life.

Are you willing to go back to student life living on minimal expenses? Remember, you stipends may well be half or even a third of what you are already earning with your current job (depending on how long you have entered the workforce).

As you grow older, you will be burdened with more responsibilities. You may get married, you may purchase a house and have to pay the mortgage, you will have a family to take care of, and you will desperately need money to get on with life. Can you revert your lifestyle to that of a student once again?

I know many people who have "planned" to do a PhD after gaining some work experience, but most never made it back to the academia precisely for the reasons I have mentioned above.

Remember: this may well be your last chance of doing a PhD!

Do it while you are still young, when you still have the freedom to do whatever you want! Give it a couple more years, things change in life and you may never be able to achieve your goal of doing a PhD anymore.


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0328sec    0.67    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 02:41 PM