QUOTE(exquisite_markas @ Oct 2 2014, 07:45 PM)
CNT itself is not a favourable sodium host. Very little sodium can be inserted into graphitic carbon in contrast to the large uptake of lithium in Li-ion battery.
Theoretical calculations suggest that this peculiar phenomena for Na-ion battery occurs because of the weak attractive interaction between inserted sodium ions and the carbon layers. As a result, there is no driving force which stimulates the insertion of sodium into the carbon structure, rather, sodium will just deposit on the anode surface as a metal.
However, CNTs are used as composite material, to increase surface conductivity and particle connectivity of the active anode material (MoO2, for example). The carbon material is electrochemically inactive, and do not participate in any electrochemical reactions.
Out of curiosity, what are some of the promising materials for sodium-based battery (as anode)? I presume intercalation would be a more prominent issue with Na. With the risk of high volume expansion after several cycles, is Na-battery really deemed to be safer? Theoretical calculations suggest that this peculiar phenomena for Na-ion battery occurs because of the weak attractive interaction between inserted sodium ions and the carbon layers. As a result, there is no driving force which stimulates the insertion of sodium into the carbon structure, rather, sodium will just deposit on the anode surface as a metal.
However, CNTs are used as composite material, to increase surface conductivity and particle connectivity of the active anode material (MoO2, for example). The carbon material is electrochemically inactive, and do not participate in any electrochemical reactions.
Also Na-battery may have slower charging/discharge rates and lower energy density. Other than safety, is there any other real selling point for Na-batt?
Mar 11 2015, 01:11 AM

Quote
0.0154sec
0.12
7 queries
GZIP Disabled