Didn't know that you have a thread specially for postgraduate students and holders.
Academic Research Thread, MPhil/PhD candidate/holder welcome!
Academic Research Thread, MPhil/PhD candidate/holder welcome!
|
|
Feb 3 2013, 09:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
2nd year PhD candidate reporting in.
Didn't know that you have a thread specially for postgraduate students and holders. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 25 2014, 11:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
Anyone here doing research in nanostructured materials for energy storage?
|
|
|
Sep 26 2014, 11:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
|
|
|
Oct 2 2014, 08:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Oct 1 2014, 07:29 PM) I'm thinking of adapting your microchannel heat sinks technology to exquisite_markas's sodium-ion energy storage technology for futuristic Spacecraft Thermal Control System. Na-ion batteries have not been tested in extreme conditions like what we have in space. But it will definitely be safer, if you are to compare that with its lithium counterpart. Well at least they are more susceptible to temperature fluctuations during operating periods.By the way, are you gonna power the heat sink with a battery, may I ask? |
|
|
Oct 2 2014, 07:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Oct 2 2014, 05:13 PM) Making the indirect use of quantum-mechanical phenomena to manipulate the smart materials to rearrange their atomic structure might be the solution to control the hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity whichever wettability we want. I am guessing that you are referring to the rearrangement of the atomic/molecular coordination? Atomic rearrangement might seem easy, but it is not as easy as it sounds. Many materials have their own thermodynamically favourable phase/polymorph. Each has its own properties, and they can be very different from one another. Most importantly, some polymorphs might have been proven to exist (theoretically), but since the activation energy (the energy required for phase formation) is too high, getting the phase you want is just impossible. Unless you can create very extreme conditions, but then cost will be an issue. This post has been edited by exquisite_markas: Oct 2 2014, 07:01 PM |
|
|
Oct 2 2014, 07:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 2 2014, 07:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
QUOTE(Critical_Fallacy @ Oct 2 2014, 07:26 PM) CNT itself is not a favourable sodium host. Very little sodium can be inserted into graphitic carbon in contrast to the large uptake of lithium in Li-ion battery.Theoretical calculations suggest that this peculiar phenomena for Na-ion battery occurs because of the weak attractive interaction between inserted sodium ions and the carbon layers. As a result, there is no driving force which stimulates the insertion of sodium into the carbon structure, rather, sodium will just deposit on the anode surface as a metal. However, CNTs are used as composite material, to increase surface conductivity and particle connectivity of the active anode material (MoO2, for example). The carbon material is electrochemically inactive, and do not participate in any electrochemical reactions. This post has been edited by exquisite_markas: Oct 2 2014, 07:47 PM |
|
|
Mar 11 2015, 11:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
QUOTE(sgthml @ Mar 11 2015, 01:11 AM) Out of curiosity, what are some of the promising materials for sodium-based battery (as anode)? I presume intercalation would be a more prominent issue with Na. With the risk of high volume expansion after several cycles, is Na-battery really deemed to be safer? You have asked some very good questions there...Also Na-battery may have slower charging/discharge rates and lower energy density. Other than safety, is there any other real selling point for Na-batt? Generally, anode materials for Na battery are classified into two categories: Na-based and non Na-based. One of the very promising Na-based anodes will be Na2Ti3O7, and its cousin, Na2Ti6O13. Both are titanium-based compounds, therefore they are fairly cheap. Another potential candidate is Fe3O4. But efforts are still underway to solve the peculiarly large irreversible capacity loss during the first cycle for Fe3O4. Yes, intercalation is a common issue with Na batteries, due to the larger ionic radii of sodium ions, as well as its heavier atomic weight. However, a lot of effort has been devoted to solve this issue, including nanostructuring and increasing its conductivity. Actually, most sodium compounds show lesser volume expansion than its lithium counterpart. For example, Na3V2(PO4)3 displays a more subdued lattice expansion upon cycling than its lithium analogue, Li3V2(PO4)3. In fact, because of this low volume expansion, many sodium-based compounds can achieve >1000 cycles at very fast rates, with minimal capacity fading. However, one thing I have to agree is that the energy density for Na battery is always inferior to Li battery because of the higher redox potential and atomic weight of Na. But having a battery which can go up to very high voltage cannot be realised yet, due to the issue with instability in non-aqueous electrolyte. Other than safe, Na battery is also relatively cheap. Sodium is very abundant in nature compared to lithium. You can find sodium in sea water, soils, rocks, etc. Currently, lithium is extracted from lithium carbonate, and the cost is going absurd due to the low supply of this lithium source. Besides that, the production cost to fabricate a Na battery is also lower. Aluminium foil can be used as current collector for both the anode and cathode, whereas copper foil (which is more expensive than aluminium) is needed for the anode in Li battery. |
|
|
Mar 24 2015, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,344 posts Joined: Jan 2011 From: Ipoh |
QUOTE(Savor_Savvy @ Mar 23 2015, 10:43 PM) Why not try NUS?QUOTE(sgthml @ Mar 24 2015, 08:25 PM) Thank you for the pointers. These explanation is pretty helpful and after doing some reading I am convinced in many ways that Na-batt can be pivotal for next generation energy storage technology. I would probably work on some studies on WS2/MoS2 with my post-doc and maybe start working on black titanium dioxide if I could. No problem.Thanks and have a good one Which uni are you joining? |
| Change to: | 0.0317sec
0.50
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 12:28 AM |