Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Academic Research Thread, MPhil/PhD candidate/holder welcome!

views
     
Human Nature
post Mar 30 2012, 03:55 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(mistabean @ Mar 19 2012, 10:18 AM)
Dunno if I belong here. M.Eng in EEIT, majoring Communication, although now working in the Automation sector.

Completed my undergrad studies in an university of applied science (UAS) in Germany right in the middle of an economy recession. Since the same university also offers Master of Engineering (M.Eng) through coursework (UAS in Germany is more geared towards practical, Universities are more theoretical), I took that chance.

I have 0 publications, I did my master thesis at Bosch HQ, where I programmed a Two-Port NWA using their HWs (I don't design the hardware).

Right now, I am thinking about going into the academic world and do my Ph.D and teach, but I like the job I am in. So maybe, if I get the chance, I like to do Industrial Ph.D.

PS: To those looking to do a doctorate in Germany, I would suggest doing Industrial Ph.D (doing it at the company, attached to a local university). Fraunhofer Institute is the most widespread research institute throughout Germany.

You can also do it the traditional way and be a RO at a university while doing research on a topic. I am not sure if you have to teach at this stage.
*
Hi there, i think you need to starting writing papers and getting them published if you are considering the academic world.


Added on March 30, 2012, 3:58 pm
QUOTE(alexkos @ Mar 25 2012, 02:47 PM)
yes there always comes a dilemma whether to even mention the contradicting studies. An ethical researcher must report what he has found. The one you highlighted normally happens when one is doing a background literature review.

Another temptation will be during data analysis. Instead of letting the finding to emerge from data itself, the researcher reports the finding selectively.
*
reporting two sides of the argument also indicates that the researcher has done thorough survey and have considered other possibilities, which is very important.

This post has been edited by Human Nature: Mar 30 2012, 03:58 PM
Human Nature
post Mar 30 2012, 04:14 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(mistabean @ Mar 30 2012, 04:06 PM)
Yeah, I thought so too. But isn't there lecturer whose focus is solely on teaching and not researching? (Other than applying new knowledge, that is)
*
In general lecturers are required to take part in teaching, research and publications, peer review, consultation works among others. You will find that publication is rewarding in terms of recognition smile.gif
Human Nature
post Apr 4 2012, 11:56 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(seanwc101 @ Apr 4 2012, 12:22 PM)
I'm not sure how it works in science & technology research but in my field, need to provide literature review on past studies that examined the same relationships to support the hypotheses. In my recent submission to a high impact journal, the editors stated my paper lost it's novelty due to the literature review that shows lots of support on similar topic. You can conduct on different issues but if it makes not much difference when the gaps we're trying to fill is very narrow, most likely got rejected by such journals.
*
applied tech publications also require same literature review on previous works and i notice a trend that many authors will reserve a section highlighting some past results achieved by others.


Added on April 4, 2012, 11:58 pm
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 4 2012, 11:43 PM)
Hi bro, long time no seeĀ  laugh.gif
Some say review papers are the easiest to write since it doesn't involve any benchworks (for Science) laugh.gif

Anyway, I agree with the sampling and experimental design. its very hard to obtain very reliable results, especially without the help of a statisticianĀ  sad.gif
*
On the contrary, I find that review papers are very difficult to write because it involves very profound understanding on the subject matter. Get one good review paper published, your citation will soar too biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by Human Nature: Apr 4 2012, 11:58 PM
Human Nature
post Apr 5 2012, 11:47 AM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
In my field, I do note that review papers are usually written by editors of the top journals, some stretching to 20 pages haha
Human Nature
post Apr 6 2012, 11:20 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(douji @ Apr 6 2012, 11:16 PM)
Does it means they are the publisher, editor and reviewer of the journal? I do notice before, but since they hold position as associate prof, so nobody questionized it.. laugh.gif
*
Some they are the editor of the same journal, but i would think that the paper will be reviewed by the assoc editors biggrin.gif

On a related note, anyone here is a reviewer? i think one should get involve in peer-review as well.
Human Nature
post Apr 7 2012, 12:24 AM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Reviewer as in the people that review the manuscript biggrin.gif i had the same thinking too until i attended a paper writing workshop. One of the tip, in the shoes of the reviewer, you will think like a reviewer. You are actually criticizing other people's work and giving your own input, so why not criticize own paper? I start with a small regional journal and found that it is quite true smile.gif

p/s hope we are not derailing the research thread
Human Nature
post Apr 12 2012, 11:20 AM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 11 2012, 06:35 PM)
Yup, I know them tongue.gif

Anyway, to keep on topic, anyone knows whether there are any ways to check the tier (ranking) of journals (WoS) without the need to search the journal citations index using our library cards?  hmm.gif
*
Tiering/Ranking is unique to each institution. In this case, you need to refer to your university for the tiering master list. I think you are referring to impact factor, citations?
Human Nature
post Apr 12 2012, 03:52 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 12 2012, 03:00 PM)
Wow, I din't know that doh.gif
You mean different journals will have different rankings, impact factor etc. in different institutions?  shocking.gif
*
No, tiering is by the institution, usually used for publication reward or promotion among the academicians. While the Impact factor indicator is carried out by thomson ISI. In most cases, the tiering done by the institution is simply based on the impact factor.
Human Nature
post Apr 14 2012, 01:33 AM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(alexkos @ Apr 13 2012, 11:18 PM)
just submitted an edited conceptual paper today for 2nd time review =)

so sad lo, the journal i'm submitting are lower tiers
*
nicely done. one small step at a time.
Human Nature
post Apr 18 2012, 06:16 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(alexkos @ Apr 18 2012, 02:35 PM)
Paper accepted for publication. WIN =D
*
The paper that you submitted 6 days ago? That's very fast.
Human Nature
post Apr 18 2012, 06:18 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Imaizumi @ Apr 18 2012, 02:39 PM)
Hi all.
I heard somewhere that if you get first class for your degree you can apply for PHD. Is it true?
If it does which university (local and internationally)?
*
You can check the entry requirement at the university's postgraduate website.
Human Nature
post Apr 19 2012, 03:45 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
^ i agree that it is better to build some research capacity before jumping to PhD.
Human Nature
post Apr 27 2012, 07:25 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(LoveMeNot @ Apr 27 2012, 03:47 PM)
envied those who have started their PhD. Somehow I'm still lagging behind on this though I've been telling myself I will look for supervisor soon enough for ages. Either I'm lack of motivation, determination or I'm just plain coward.

Give me some kick in the ass guys!  cry.gif  cry.gif
*
maybe coz you are busy with working life?
Human Nature
post Jun 18 2012, 08:56 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(ShrugsLova @ Jun 12 2012, 08:23 PM)
I wrote the whole paper, he just amend a few thing from my draft. He then submitted the whole friggin thing after i graduated. But he did guide me throughout my research..

The name is just misspelled, all in all, it's still reassemble my name.
*
A name spelling error occured to me but it was due to the publishing house mistake.

You may contact the editor to change the spelling but it will only be for softcopy search ie google scholar, sciencedirect, etc as it is considered published and printed.

Since you are not the corresponding author, you may need to be able to identify yourself. My advice is request your supervisor to contact the editor to correct this.

Added on June 18, 2012, 9:00 pm
QUOTE(alexkos @ Jun 17 2012, 11:11 PM)
Accounting Education: An international journal

mine has no impact factor, not listed in ISI =/
*
Dont worry, getting the first paper is always the most difficult and will spur you to produce more. Try to be more adventurous and submit to ISI listed journal next time.


Added on June 18, 2012, 9:07 pm
QUOTE(seanwc101 @ Jun 12 2012, 10:27 AM)
my manuscript already rejected by 3 journals. 1. straight reject by editor, 2. straight reject by one of the reviewer, and 3. reject with major amendment which I decided not to pursue.
*
dont lose hope. read what are the reviewers comment and improve the paper. straight reject by editor could be due to different scope or it is something considered not novel (for high IF journal). Sometimes, you may need more data or discussion to strenthen your case. alternatively, you may withdraw, do some minor revision and submit to another journal.

some tips, it is not always necessary to follow everything the reviewer ask you to do or add, unless it is stated mandatory. of course you must give a solid justification, cite some reference ass back up etc.

This post has been edited by Human Nature: Jun 18 2012, 09:25 PM
Human Nature
post Jun 20 2012, 04:53 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
What I do is leave the caption on the text as well.
Human Nature
post Jul 22 2012, 12:10 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(alexkos @ Jul 22 2012, 09:56 AM)
hi, hope all are doing well. my conference paper presented in late dec 2011 is now offered for journal publication. such a joy =)
*
congrats, you are reaping the rewards now smile.gif
Human Nature
post Aug 1 2012, 12:05 PM

- student of human nature -
*********
All Stars
26,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(seanwc101 @ Aug 1 2012, 11:54 AM)
Guys, I got a question. Is it recommendable to contact authors and request for a copy of their journal papers when we cannot get access to their full paper online? Recently I e-mailed an author of a journal to get his full length paper but that's because he openly encourages people to do so.
*
Yes, definitely. They will want others to cite their papers too. Some will responds, some not maybe due to change of working place/email, or simply too busy.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0371sec    0.55    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 09:59 AM