gotta love d imc part, very useful as some reviews only push cpu clock w/o touchin imc freq. we all know that it's not that efficient to have high cpu clock but imc freq is stuck @ stock.
This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Jun 28 2011, 10:47 AM
[Review] AMD Phenom II 1100T, Some Test
|
|
Jun 28 2011, 09:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
great jobs bro... it puts my noobish review to shame.
gotta love d imc part, very useful as some reviews only push cpu clock w/o touchin imc freq. we all know that it's not that efficient to have high cpu clock but imc freq is stuck @ stock. This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Jun 28 2011, 10:47 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2011, 10:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
QUOTE(saturn85 @ Jun 29 2011, 03:25 AM) it's d pwm which failed i think. to prime a hexacore monster on 4+1pwm board is too much for d board to take. This post has been edited by ah_khoo: Jun 29 2011, 10:39 AM |
|
|
Jun 30 2011, 07:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2011, 10:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2011, 10:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
8,103 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tanah Lot @ Dungun, Terengganu. |
QUOTE(eddyTech03 @ Sep 11 2011, 01:35 PM) i would like to ask, i believe SPi is not optimized for Intel architecture coz before C2D era, AMD was more superior than Intel in SPi, but once C2D released, the performance gap has been widen, marginally. from what i know, super PI is code optimize for intel architec. is it true??? some said that, even pentium 4 can do better calculation over amd phenom 2 in super PI. |
| Change to: | 0.0166sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 02:28 AM |