ACCA V7, Global Body for Professional Accountants
|
|
 Nov 30 2011, 12:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
3,997 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Why So Serious? 
|
QUOTE(nothingz @ Nov 29 2011, 07:39 PM) pray hard that those theory questions that you don't know will not come out in exam. LOL Who's your lecturer?my lecturer also said that P4 is easy for him but difficult to make the students understand  |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2011, 05:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
3,997 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Why So Serious?
|
QUOTE(colleenlee @ Dec 1 2011, 04:35 PM) yeah, i agree. last sitting was predictable. i was unable to complete some questions in Section B Collectively P2 is one of the easier papers, it boils down to the amount of time you spend to cover the voluminous syllabus. i dun think it would be a combo unless lesser adjustments. i think as an examiner, they would test us on standards, rather than technique of conso.  just study our best.  |
|
|
Dec 7 2011, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
3,997 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Why So Serious?
|
QUOTE(shirley_andy @ Dec 7 2011, 02:00 AM) ya i got confused about basis risk too... one moment say assume no basis risk, then suddenly say basis risk linear(means must count)... Basis risk is the risk of the movement of underlying instrument not being in tandem with the derivative. Basis, however, does decline in a linear manner.i wonder can I even get more then 20marks |
|
|
Dec 7 2011, 08:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
3,997 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Why So Serious?
|
QUOTE(tzxsean @ Dec 7 2011, 06:16 PM) no la... im talking bout Annuity Depreciation la Asset value/Annuity factor = Annual Depreciation.the ( annual equivalent CF - imputed interest ) formula im saying the annual equivalent CF stays the same every year while imputed interest is different Can reconcile using RI. This serves to link NPV & RI. |
|
|
Dec 8 2011, 10:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
3,997 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Why So Serious?
|
QUOTE(Doreamon10 @ Dec 8 2011, 10:39 AM) I love your work too! Good analysis of what we are feeling. P3 on next monday...i am shivering, the more I revised, the more knowledge-gap i discovered BCG places heavy emphasis on analysis of comparison between competitors. Growth rate of 10% might be low assuming that during in an economic cycle of full employment rate. Bottom line, compare and compare before getting into any conclusion.Added on December 8, 2011, 10:48 amCan I ask a question regarding P3? BCG Matrix (Market Growth rate and Relative Market Share) For Market Growth Rate - above 10% is regarded as high right? What about Relative Market Share - what percentage is regarded as high or low? Need to know in order to map them correctly on the matrix. I should have trashed this out earlier .... a bit too late...tried to check online but no info...jia lat. Anyone knows the answer? As for the relative market share, anything above 1.0 will be considered as market leader. Added on December 8, 2011, 10:58 am QUOTE(tzxsean @ Dec 7 2011, 10:19 PM) dun wan la... my voice not nice QUOTE(Def @ Dec 7 2011, 10:47 PM) sweetie....I can duet with you. QUOTE(tzxsean @ Dec 7 2011, 10:48 PM) I'm a guy Guys, please keep this thread clean. Any discussions beyond ACCA related content should be limited.and not intend to be famous This post has been edited by aaron1kee: Dec 8 2011, 10:58 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0193sec
 0.58
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 11:33 PM |
Quote