Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 2011 Kia Optima, when will launch in Malaysia?

views
     
rcracer
post Jul 15 2011, 05:10 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

But the interior lose to Sonata
rcracer
post Dec 20 2011, 07:07 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

I would put my money on this car solely for the Infinity sound system already
rcracer
post Dec 21 2011, 01:09 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(turbocharged @ Dec 21 2011, 04:48 AM)
i think a lot of ppl here are looking for cheap japanese alternative.

and a lot disappointed because there aren't any cheaper alternatives out there.
*
I think if they cut 3/4 off the spec list, or minimum match 1 to 1 to jap but price it 10k cheaper, it will be next best thing invented since sliced bread.
rcracer
post Dec 23 2011, 12:37 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(leds @ Dec 22 2011, 04:35 PM)
another rumours from forumer said the actual price shoud be rm148,888.00...now getting expensive or what??exepnsive then sonata HS
*
That's nothing for the standard features they are giving
rcracer
post Dec 23 2011, 02:17 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(yamasce @ Dec 22 2011, 05:50 PM)
so u agree with tat pricing???anyway not tat they r giving another option other than the premium specs...it's either take it or leave it...but still i hope max is 145k la...149k is too much liao
*
definately, it's a bargain compared to anything in the same class for the same bracket.

It's a lot of car for the money.
rcracer
post Dec 24 2011, 09:52 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(saujana @ Dec 24 2011, 01:08 PM)
ohmy.gif  shakehead.gif  hmm.gif 

almost wanna book, now thinking twice...... can get accord 2.0 HS with this already...........
*
just for the infinity audio is already much better than accord to wait out the traffic jams
rcracer
post Dec 27 2011, 06:53 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(Bliz @ Dec 27 2011, 09:41 AM)
Somehow the engines of Korean make are not really up the mark compared to Conti/Jap car  shakehead.gif
*
No they are, we just don't get them

For this they have the GDi 2.4, and turbo 2.0
rcracer
post Dec 27 2011, 07:00 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(gregy @ Dec 27 2011, 11:55 AM)
A Navi upgrade at the most will cost RM2k (aftermarket). With or w/out Navi, the price is still a bit on the high side.

And no bi-xenons... I didn't know that until I tested it out myself this afternoon.
*
If japanese gave you the same specs at 20k premium would you say it's overkill or justified because it's japanese?
rcracer
post Dec 27 2011, 07:44 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(gregy @ Dec 27 2011, 12:10 PM)
The highest specced Jap D-segment at the moment is the Camry 2.0G at Rm155k OTR. In terms of spec, give or take this K5 is in the ballpark. So between 144k and 155k, the difference in percentage is a mere 7%. So are you saying that a Kia is rightfully only 7% cheaper than the class leader?
*
At the spec level the it's more than 7% cheaper than the 'class leader', for eg. the Inifinity sound system which if the japs offered would be a minimum 10k option, plus the high performance dampers for the suspension which are tremendously good.

They give a lot of aftermarket stuffs as standard plus being 7% cheaper.
rcracer
post Dec 27 2011, 11:19 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(hbong @ Dec 27 2011, 04:17 PM)
wrong pricing la... 143k for optima? accord 142k only lehh..
*
accord same spec level as city, still worth it?
rcracer
post Dec 27 2011, 11:22 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(hbong @ Dec 27 2011, 04:20 PM)
Accord has the luxury and big car feel... the drive will do the talking.. and 5 yrs down the road accord still rock solid n holds good second hand value.. my 2 cents
*
The mind create the luxury for Accord, actually is nothing special also.

This Kia has a real proper suspension system as reviewed.

Auto-leveling HID xenon headlamps

LED-daytime running lights

Leather interior, a supervision cluster and a multifunction four-spoke steering wheel with paddle shifters and controls for audio, ECO-driving, auto cruise-control. There’s also a six-CD changer audio system with an eight-speaker (not seven, as speculated) Infinity speaker system, replete with Aux, iPod and USB connectivity.

dual-zone auto air-conditioning, full-width three-piece panoramic glass sunroof, push-button start/stop, illuminated door scuff plates and USB connectivity, as well as a tailgate-mounted reversing safety camera with interior mirror LCD display monitor.

The driver gets an 8-way electronically-controlled seat with an integrated memory seat function, which retains settings for two drivers based on their seating position. In terms of safety, the car comes equipped with six airbags (dual front, front side and full length-curtain) and an electronic stability programme incorporating ABS, EBD, TCS, brake assist and hill-start assist control.

It also wears HPD (high performance dampers) as part of its suspension setup

Bloody amazing spec list, impossible the japs will match HALF the specs for 10k more money

This post has been edited by rcracer: Dec 27 2011, 11:34 PM
rcracer
post Dec 28 2011, 01:48 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(keeting89 @ Dec 27 2011, 06:43 PM)
frankly speaking, will you really spend RM145k on KIA, even you know with that price you can buy camry or accord..
T and H give premium feels because of goodwill, but KIA doesn;t.
Pay peanut get peanut
in this case for kia, pay premium get peanut..

2012 mostly likely camry 2012 will come in, the current camry is 5 yr old model, sooner will become 6 yr old model, this is unfair to compare about. But what i know, T and H is stil kicking and solid after 7-8yr, yet kia stil unknown since it's stil new..

Will u actually  risk your hard earn money only pressurize you for few years, then gv you headache after that..?
forte is good for money, but for optima i don think it is yes..
*
Japs are so full of shit with their interiors with hard plastics, they are dying in europe, NOBODY is buying jap cars.

KIA were the firsts to offer 5 years warranties on their cars, sealed for life gearboxes.

Toyota and Honda totally failed in producing a decent diesel engine, while the KIA and Hyundai came up with German beating R diesels.

They can give an Infinity audio system, panaromic glass roof.

I think it's damn clear, the japs are the ones giving peanuts for premium
rcracer
post Dec 28 2011, 02:54 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 27 2011, 07:23 PM)
Well i must agree although im a Toyota fan for many years. The Japs need a kick up their ass and the Koreans are giving them that. Just look at the disappointing designs coming out of Toyota & Honda these days. The 2012 Honda Civic was voted Most Disappointing car with poor marks for quality while the upcoming Camry is a step back in terms of design. Looks more like a facelift in fact.

But im keeping my fingers crossed that the Malaysian Camry due in May 2012 will have much better specs, transmission and engine.
*
You can already see the specs for the Camry, read Australian websites.

rcracer
post Dec 28 2011, 03:27 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(xVince @ Dec 27 2011, 08:15 PM)
Current gen Camry & Accord HS is about 10k more expensive and is true that it is unfair to compare to the current models. But if you wanna compare with the new models, do you think the price will maintain the same? I don't think so.

The new gen Camry probably gonna about 5-10k more than the current model and I doubt the spec they offer can be as good as the Optima K5.
*
if they give the same spec, they will give a ridiculous engine like 2.5 or 3 litre V6 which nobody will buy anyways and the next inline will have half the specs and be 10k more
rcracer
post Dec 28 2011, 02:19 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 28 2011, 03:17 AM)
Any response to my earlier question on the CBC and BAS for Safety? Its stated on the brochure but what does it mean? Cant be Cornering Brake Control?
*
BAS i found is Brake Assist System, i guess it's part of the traction control where it applies brakes to the wheel that is slipping. CBC no idea


Added on December 28, 2011, 2:21 pm
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 28 2011, 03:20 AM)
Yes i must say the Infinity sound system is no big deal. I dont see what the hype is all about. Sounds basically the same. Is Infinity supposed to be better than JBL? Can somebody provide a ranking list of Top 10 sound systems in the world? This is 1 area im far lacking.

The rear subwoofer on the Optima is located off centre at the back. Any reason for this? Makes the rear arrangement a bit cacat if u ask me. Very noticeable.
*
ACtually it is a big deal, go search some reviews on this particular system in this particular car, not just their prodcuts

I read some where hardcore haters of stock systems loved it, so much so their colleagues had to do another review just to believe what they were reading in his report.

Plus another i really like is the kick to the face to the Japs, if not for them the japs will continue giving us poor interiors lousy 1990 VVTi of a bygone era.

I have no doubt if the fuel quality if bumped up, the GDi 2.4 or even the Turbo 2.0 will see its way here

This post has been edited by rcracer: Dec 28 2011, 02:27 PM
rcracer
post Dec 28 2011, 06:37 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 28 2011, 08:36 AM)
Ive just had a 2nd look at the Optima this time at PJ. Spent about 1.5 hrs there going thru every nook and corner.

As i said before, the design and specs are quite good. Now im told it has Cornering Brake Control (CBC) which is a premium feature in BMW, etc. Rear legroom is really good. Dashboard needs a bit of getting used to. Rear seats not really comfortable for taller passengers if you sit longer. Sound system doesnt sound balanced when ure in driver's seat despite adjustment. You only get the surround effect in the rear seats. Besides that not much excitement bout the Infinity sound system.

Also alot of water condensation from aircons on the floor. Never seen this much water on any other car before. Does give some doubts bout the compressor. Leather seats are not of the highest quality. The Peugeot 508 had much better leather seats for sure. But as always, i still think the price for the Optima is a tad high. If Naza had priced it at RM 139K, it would have nailed it. But alas!
*
Condensation means the system is working excellently, the cooling coil is getting really cold to have so much water condense on to it
rcracer
post Dec 29 2011, 03:33 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

You guys still living in dark ages comparing parts, look all parts nowadays come from china or taiwan, doesn't matter who is the buyer from Kia to Mercedes, all from the same factory.

Only difference is what your car maker specify, low med high quality. But the manafacturing will be the same machine same line different mould only.

So saying one will last longer than the other is moot
rcracer
post Jan 6 2012, 06:46 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jan 6 2012, 09:20 AM)
Ure wrong. There's a big difference between the Forte and the Optima. The Forte was priced very well. It was way below its competition with superior specs. Plus the car had a good design and interior. You can say it was the almost perfect blend of criterias to make good sales. And it did have some decent sales which would have been better if not for Kia's after sales service & resale value.

The Optima on the other hand is coming in at a high price. It has the other criteria's but ultimately its the price thats gonna determine its success. And im quite sure, Naza will introduce some FOC goodies in the near future to boost sales when it starts to stagnate. The Kia Facebook page is starting to become quiet now after the initial euphoria.

So my advice to you is to wait just a few more months to gauge the perfomance of the car. Let the initial heat cool down. Wait for test drive units to come, test the car yourself and let some professionals test and come out with reports. After that make your decision. Dont rush into it trying to be among the first to put the car on the road. Sometimes that initial wow factor may not be worth it in the long run.

Im also seriously considering this car so we're kinda in the same boat. Just my 2 cents.
*
the optima is not 'new', there are already plenty of reviews of the car overseas and generally they are very good
rcracer
post Jan 6 2012, 09:31 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(DSV4600 @ Jan 6 2012, 12:51 PM)
Overseas market is a different ballgame. Cars are priced competitively, and their resale values are almost similar.
Here, T&H dominate in terms of resale value. Also, in global markets, Hyundais are always priced higher than Kias, as it's the premium brand, while the latter is the value brand.
*
Price how to compare with malaysia of course, what i mean is the technical aspects of the car, just the car itself just evaluate the car objectively

If the reviews are really good and they beat the japs and in malaysia is cheaper than the japs also it means it's a lot of car for your money.

This post has been edited by rcracer: Jan 6 2012, 09:32 PM
rcracer
post Jan 7 2012, 04:15 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jan 7 2012, 06:45 AM)
I think the difference is much bigger. Let me give u an example:

2003 Hyundai Sonata 2.0L original purchase price approx RM 110K current selling price RM25K (77% loss in resale value)
2003 Toyota Vios 1.5L purchase price RM74,700 current selling price RM 41K (45% loss in resale value)

I know its not an ideal example since its a different segment but its just to give you an idea. Sorry to bring up the Vios again.  biggrin.gif
*
Koreans pre 2008 are the worst horrible rubbish ever produced second to the Chinese. They deserve the low price.

But since then they have improved so much even exceeding the Japan in quality and technology and styling. The vios at 74k in it's time was also pure cheap plastic push around type of car that isn't worth of that price.

On that level both were overpriced and both rubbish


4 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0515sec    0.37    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 10:04 PM