QUOTE(hihihehe @ Jun 19 2011, 09:19 PM)
TOO DAMN EPICFAZTER CLICK LIKE
I <3 Lembugini
|
|
Jun 19 2011, 09:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
684 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2011, 09:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
684 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2011, 01:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
684 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
silly question: Why they build engine belakang instead of front?
|
|
|
Jun 20 2011, 02:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
684 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
QUOTE(dawghause @ Jun 20 2011, 02:04 PM) Well since nobody will give a flying f*** to this question, I shall just entertain myself and answer it. so why didnt every carmaker throw engines into the back? (srs question)The rear engine layout is easier to maintain and assemble, but that is besides the point. Ferdinand Porsche put the engine in the back in the 911 because when you accelerate your car's weight transfers to the rear, so with the engine hanging over the rear wheels, it presses more weight thus giving you better traction and better acceleration. As such when driving a 911 you can get on the accelerator much much earlier when coming out of the bend than you would in a normal car or supercar, and use the weight in the rear to press down on the road and slingshot you out of the corner. |
|
|
Jun 20 2011, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
684 posts Joined: Dec 2007 |
thx thx for explanations lol
|
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0231sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 02:34 PM |