Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

27 Pages « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> I <3 Lembugini

views
     
TSericmaxman
post Jun 20 2011, 02:48 PM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(scyap @ Jun 20 2011, 02:35 PM)
so why didnt every carmaker throw engines into the back? (srs question)
*
same question why torsion beam keeps appearing more n more
rcracer
post Jun 20 2011, 02:49 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(ericmaxman @ Jun 20 2011, 08:48 AM)
same question why torsion beam keeps appearing more n more
*
cost effective and simplicity of design, easy adaptability across models range reducing development cost and customers anyways can't tell the difference for normal road cars
TSericmaxman
post Jun 20 2011, 02:51 PM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(rcracer @ Jun 20 2011, 02:49 PM)
cost effective and simplicity of design, easy adaptability across models range reducing development cost and customers anyways can't tell the difference for normal road cars
*
some say torsion beam sucks,

other say it got the fastest time round the 'ring for a FWD
marvinben
post Jun 20 2011, 02:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
249 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(ericmaxman @ Jun 20 2011, 02:51 PM)
some say torsion beam sucks,

other say it got the fastest time round the 'ring for a FWD
*
99% people wont even notice the difference.

inb4 fiat coupe was fastest fwd.

This post has been edited by marvinben: Jun 20 2011, 02:53 PM
dawghause
post Jun 20 2011, 03:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(scyap @ Jun 20 2011, 02:35 PM)
so why didnt every carmaker throw engines into the back? (srs question)
*
because handling a rear engine car is dangerous if done incorrectly, without any weight pressing in front you would understeer, and if you go too fast into a bend the weight of the engine at the back causes a pendulum effect giving you oversteer.

as marvinben says, Porsche has spent decades tuning the 911's chassis around this problem, other car makers simply gave up.
because of that Porsche is one of the best chassis experts in the world.

Putting the engine in the middle is great for balance, bad for practicality as you can't put things like rear seats or luggage space, all because that's where the engine would go.
Also can you imagine servicing a mid-engined car, you would have to lift up the whole car just for an oil change, or just changing the bloody spark plugs would cause you to bust a testicle.

Ironically the most cost-effective way to build a compact car today is the rear-engined layout as it gives more room in the front for the cabin, and the steering rack won't have to be squeeze in with the engine like front-engined, front wheel drive cars (FF).

The reason why we don't see more rear-engined rear-wheel drive cars is because production processes, engine design, and platform design has already been engineered and built around the FF-layout.
So it would be costly to invest in designing new platforms for RR cars.


Yes, rear torsion beam suspension is designed for cost-efficiency, and it gives you more luggage space.
Yes, the fastest FF car around Nurburgring is the Renault Megane R26R with its rear torsion beam suspension.
Somehow the Europeans seem to have the magic touch in tuning rear torsion beam suspension, something which Japanese carmakers can't seem to get right.
Just test drive a Ford Fiesta and Honda Jazz and you can see the difference in what I mean.
Razaelx
post Jun 20 2011, 03:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: PJ



My e90 pwns both
marvinben
post Jun 20 2011, 03:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
249 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
Fun fact: VW Beetle used to mount engine in the arse.
SUSdantck
post Jun 20 2011, 03:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,004 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: penang


QUOTE(marvinben @ Jun 20 2011, 02:53 PM)
99% people wont even notice the difference.

inb4 fiat coupe was fastest fwd.
*
lol wiith rear wheel locked , wira evo is the fastest fwd
marvinben
post Jun 20 2011, 03:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
249 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(dantck @ Jun 20 2011, 03:14 PM)
lol wiith rear wheel locked , wira evo is the fastest fwd
*
rear wheel locked? ayam no understand.
SUSdantck
post Jun 20 2011, 03:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,004 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: penang


QUOTE(marvinben @ Jun 20 2011, 03:15 PM)
rear wheel locked? ayam no understand.
*
4wd can lock 2 wheel
dawghause
post Jun 20 2011, 03:17 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(marvinben @ Jun 20 2011, 03:11 PM)
Fun fact: VW Beetle used to mount engine in the arse.
*
Fun fact the man behind it was Ferdinand Porsche, who is said to have stolen the idea from Czechoslovakian car maker, Tatra before the start of the WW2.

Anyway I feel like I'm causing this thread to terserong nicely.

Have a nice day, all of you.
Enjoy Ericmaxman's pic, brought lots of LOLs and Facepalms to office.
I'm heading back to work.
marvinben
post Jun 20 2011, 03:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
249 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
QUOTE(dantck @ Jun 20 2011, 03:16 PM)
4wd can lock 2 wheel
*
oh now i get it, locking the diff. sorry for the confusion.
ichi_24
post Jun 20 2011, 03:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
480 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: /K/opitiam



QUOTE(dantck @ Jun 20 2011, 03:14 PM)
lol wiith rear wheel locked , wira evo is the fastest fwd
*
that's why ayam love wira gsr
scyap
post Jun 20 2011, 03:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
684 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


thx thx for explanations lol
Vengeance_Mad
post Jun 20 2011, 03:44 PM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(marvinben @ Jun 20 2011, 02:00 PM)
if you have nothing intelligence to post. go play your dota la  doh.gif
*
QUOTE(dawghause @ Jun 20 2011, 02:05 PM)
+1 to that haha
*
Sorry to disappoint u guys I nvr play Dora for years d.
pastst
post Jun 20 2011, 03:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
135 posts

Joined: Apr 2010



QUOTE(dawghause @ Jun 20 2011, 12:03 PM)
You mean the R35 in GT500 class  pawning the Lambos competing in GT300 class?
Different class, different regulations noob.
GT500 looks the same as road going cars only, everything underneath can be changed.
GT300 regulations restrict teams from doing too much modifications, and must keep to the original road-going car's engine and setup.

If you want to see the GT-R vs Murcielago under the same rules and regulations look at FIA GT1 World Championship where they compete under the same regulations.
*
If I recall correctly, GT-R was 14 seconds ahead of the lambo, so b4 talking shit go and watch it
moorish
post Jun 20 2011, 03:57 PM

Material Girl
******
Senior Member
1,874 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: "On a need-to-know basis"


malaysian driver duno how to drive lembukini, they drive lembucart.
Last 2 mths one edi accident, now again
Truckster
post Jun 20 2011, 04:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


this photos should appear @ wreckedexotics.com by now!
fix24311
post Jun 20 2011, 04:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
139 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Shah Alam, Selangor
thx 4 all awesome answers i received today. such as rear engine, front engine, mid engine. plate numbers, etc...
one more q: what is jalopnik? famous amos or not? unsure.gif
blo0dLuSt
post Jun 20 2011, 04:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(pastst @ Jun 20 2011, 03:54 PM)
If I recall correctly, GT-R was 14 seconds ahead of the lambo, so b4 talking shit go and watch it
*
ya2. the gtr is faster but its a sports car. not a supercar. lambo is a supercar which have exclusivity, style, sounds. while gtr is a sports car which will do "function over style" thing. thats y the gtr is specifically designed to be fast on a track(the NERD-BIRD-THING thingy) while lambo is designed to be mad and flamboyant ("look at me" thingy). i know u re one of gtr fanboy but seeing gtr in malaysia is becoming common nowadays while a lambo, furthermore a SV model is soooo RARE.. so comparing both cars are like comparing apples and oranges already.

btw i also read other posts about this accident and LOL'd hard when reading comments like " wa, if like dat better buy BMW instead of lambo (seeing less damage to the cars)".

err anyone for LAMBO MURCIE 670-4SV HALFCUT? xD

This post has been edited by blo0dLuSt: Jun 20 2011, 04:51 PM

27 Pages « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » 
Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0269sec    0.22    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 10:02 AM