QUOTE(nexona88 @ Nov 1 2017, 06:37 PM)
won't be anytime soon
astro always very slow in adapting new technology standards
What I meant by:
Video content providers = any kinds of platform that offers video-related services such as satellite TV, digital TV, internet video streaming, etc.Many video content providers, from free or pay type, don't implement HEVC (H.265) just yet, because of the very very expensive patent fees, which is around 4x the patent fees of H.264. You can Google more about it. Patent is one thing. The provider/broadcasters have to upgrade their equipments to support H.265 HEVC somemore leh. And we consumers have to upgrade our related devices like set-top-boxes.
Yes, I'm talking about a change or upgrade take could go up to billions of dollars (not RM ringgit oh).
In general, even if Astro or MYTV uses H.265 (HEVC) or H.264 codec, we as viewers/consumer won't see the difference in terms of image quality.
The only difference is the technical advantage which saves bandwidth (sounds like supposed it will save cost as well?), but in return, service providers have to pay more patent fees and upgrades related equipment, eventually the costs doesn't look feasible and efficient at all. Many video service providers around the world are unhappy about this, so they rather stick with H.264 or find other alternatives if available.
So, if you are video content provider, would you throw in money to implement H.265 (HEVC) video compression technology because it is a new and latest technology, and yes, you like new high tech stuff, can save bandwidth and stuff, but in return you got to pay 4x more of the patent fees compared to H.264 which you already have, somemore upgrade your video processing equipment and your customer's device to support H.265 (HEVC)? Are you willing to do that?