QUOTE(moorish @ Jun 11 2011, 04:41 PM)
Natural chicken pox = suffer
Vaccine with the possibility of getting chicken pox later in life but much milder version = more comfortable
The chicken pox immunity of the 2 got differences?
The chicken pox you get later in life isn't milder at all, it is much worse the older you are which is why a lot of people like me try to expose our kid to chicken pox naturally when they are around 2-4 years old, to get it out of the way while they are young enough to recover quickly but old enough to cope with it. To a 3-4 year old chicken pox means a light fever and around a week or so of itchiness, for a 16-18year old it can mean hospitalization.
Of course there is still the chance to get it later in life whether you go natural or vaccinate but the long term effects of getting chicken pox naturally are known (practically none, beside the minor chance of shingles later in life), the long term effects of the vaccination are not.
It is also known that if you go through natural chicken pox the chances of relapsing later in life (shingles) is very low under normal circumstances (it is usually only when the immune system is already compromised that shingles pops up). With the vaccination, i haven't read anything that convinces me that anyone knows its effective lifespan.
I just don't agree with using drugs and vaccinations when they aren't necessary especially when a large number of the 'super-viruses' and more severe flu like bugs we have around today are purely the result of overusing medications like antibiotics. Unless they are used to prevent or cure a serious or potentially fatal disease all you are doing is sacrificing natural immune system strength for the convenience of skipping a few days of grumpiness and mild discomfort.