why why why?
is it my mobo limitation?
even with 289x9 for cpu while i set my ram divider to ddr333 it can't boot also
TCCD/TCC5 discussions, memory tuning, voltage, etc.
|
|
 Apr 15 2006, 05:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong  
|
my tccd can't even pass 260 mhz with 1:1 divider with timing 3-4-4-8,1T @ 2.85 vdimm
why why why? is it my mobo limitation? even with 289x9 for cpu while i set my ram divider to ddr333 it can't boot also |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 08:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
now im doing 221mhz at 2.5-3-3-6, 1T @ 2.7vdimm
stable |
|
|
Apr 29 2006, 08:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
hey guys, help me out
 i'm using ocz el platinum rev 2.0 pc 3200 (512x2) with tccd chips. with 244x9 at 1:1 divider (2.5-3-3-6,1T), my sisoft score is 6100++ here's the 2nd situation, with 325x8 at divider DDR133 (2.5-3-3-6,1T), my sisoft score is 6400++ why? i thought with higher ram mhz, it suppose to run faster? *anyway, my jetway mobo is limiting my ram overclocking ability over 250mhz , getting a dfi sli-d soon* |
|
|
Apr 30 2006, 06:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ Apr 29 2006, 08:19 PM) yr CPU speed boosted the RAM score significantly. but running at 325x8 at divider ddr133 or 244x9 1:1 divider is better? |
|
|
Apr 30 2006, 12:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
as you can see, at 325x8 and 244x9, both have the same timings, 2.5-3-3-6, 1T
|
|
|
May 1 2006, 08:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ May 1 2006, 03:24 PM) u try using 7x325 and 9x244, i think the result should favour 9x244. 8x325 has high CPU clock ,tat's y the result is better alright will give it a try later and see what's the different, maybe cpu speed boost up the score too |
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 2006, 10:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
ok, done! i set it to 325x7 and the score drops back to 5.9k
so i guess proc speed does helps abit too. so u recommend me to run at 325x8(ddr133) or 244x9(ddr200) ? |
|
|
May 2 2006, 12:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
getting my new mobo soon dfi sli-d, hope can clock it at 289x9 with 1:1 divider and get great scores
 |
|
|
May 23 2006, 07:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
QUOTE(diablo69 @ May 23 2006, 10:49 AM) wondering if can improve da setting... anyone can help... my venice max is 300 only.. 310 can load into windows but got problem.. try lower ur ldt multiplier to x3, anyway 1.7vcore is damn high settings my specs in my sig... tis ram wont pass 230... very sad  ... if try to push pass 230, will load and run windows but will have immediate error in super PI and SP2004... so i think just stick here for awhile n optimize the settings... 280 is the max for the proc, oledi try wit higher voltage(accidentally psuh until 1.7v) but still cannot... better careful, wat cooler u are using? |
|
|
May 24 2006, 08:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
1,599 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Puchong
|
QUOTE(diablo69 @ May 23 2006, 07:53 PM) da ldt multiplier was set at 3x since i start OCing this proc... using ninja plus with da supplied fan... manage to maintain max 47C... very itchy to push vcore since its onli at 1.5v bios set... maybe thats ur proc limitation already, mine max at 300 only, tried pushed to 1.86vcore but still not stable |
| Change to: |  0.0273sec
 0.33
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:20 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.