Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
TCCD/TCC5 discussions, memory tuning, voltage, etc.
|
gsan
|
 Aug 31 2005, 03:40 AM
|
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Aug 30 2005, 07:35 PM) after you can pass memtest86 #5, try to enter windows. if you cannot stable in windows, you might need to increase your chipset, agp or cpu voltage. or maybe u need to bump your agp speed to 67mhz. no need to alter your vdimm anymore. what do you mean by "cannot stable in windows" ? my GH run 235 @ 2-2-2-5 stable in memtest65#5 for more than 13hours and 240 @ 2-2-2-5 for more than 9hours but with 2 errors only. but come to windows, few minute later, the pc automatic reboot, increase the agp voltage or speed will make it stable? |
|
|
|
|
|
gsan
|
Jun 17 2007, 10:52 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(leadaxer @ Jun 17 2007, 12:42 AM) Hmm, wut do u mean by 'runs better' in amd platform? Compatibility? Reliability? Performance? I would say that Intel-based CPUs are the ones that are lax when it comes to timings. Luck is, well of coz part of the matter too. My enquiry is just that would it be stretching the limit, if the above-mentioned RAM would be to increase by a mere 10MHz? Thanx. ya, what he said is true. I'd tried 2x512mb corsair tccd on both amd and intel platform. it can prime at least 270 @ cl2.5 stable on dfi nf4 but only up to 22x on even with very loose timing on intel p4 2.6c. I owned a pair of geil one-s tccd, doing 300 @ 2.5-4-3-8 prime stable on dfi nf4 platform but it were sold to another forumer and he told me that he able to do 31x with the same timing.  |
|
|
|
|
|
gsan
|
Jun 17 2007, 01:11 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(leadaxer @ Jun 17 2007, 12:43 PM) Ok, thanx for the input. But my concern is NOT how much or how far this baby can go. It is purely simple. Assume that: - Timings can be very loose: 3-4-4-8 - Vdcc can go anywhere from 2.6V up to 3.2V - Multiplier is locked And judging from the specs of the said RAM: Team Xtreem Hermes DDR1
PC4400 DDR 550MHz
512MBX2, 2.5-4-3-7, 2.7~2.9VThat would make it have a standard clockspeed of 275MHz. My question is, could it make 280MHz without much of a sweat..or is it near the absolute limit already...? I believe that it could not, but you may try. |
|
|
|
|
|
gsan
|
Jun 17 2007, 02:06 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(leadaxer @ Jun 17 2007, 01:43 PM) I do not have it with me to try it. But y do u say that it could not? as I said on the previous post, it's kinda oc 2x512mb tccd on intel platform. |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0245sec
0.29
7 queries
GZIP Disabled