video uploaded on 21 July ~ 2010

PETRONAS RON95 ~ 35.57 seconds


SHELL RON95 ~ 31.59 seconds


BHP RON95 ~ 30.53 seconds


MOBIL RON95 ~ 26.44 seconds


ESSO RON95 ~ 26.04 seconds


CALTEX RON95 ~ 25.36 seconds


experiment done at home..

so petronas wins?

i think burn fastest is more concentrated and burn slower means less fuel

so which one the best ron95 ? i heard caltex ron95 is the best ..is it true?

so....i think burn longer use less fuel la bodoh...

u see...a single drop of fuel can be burn for 10 seconds for an example.


if petrollnas can burn 10 seconds , caltex can burn longer 15seconds.

so caltex > petrollnas.

lambat bakar lambat pegi

low fuel burn = low fuel consumption = $$$$

not sure about power tho

not to fast not to slow.... so shell wins??

cepat terbakar more pickup???

you know how engine works???

seriously , i dunno lol

then stfu?

explain how engine works please

google kong?

u seem to know then u explain..... how's it work

u know?

Nothing here makes any sense since the burning isn't done at the right compression, has no atomization, the AFR is all wrong and the TS is a known moron.

eh...enough of the who knows who knows la....im interested to know

hahahahahahahahahahaha

this video totally fuk up...

Shortest faster for under 1000cc
Middle faster for under 1.3-1.6cc
Longer faster for under 1.8-3.5 cc

^ u have a very nice cute face

mana chili sos?

I thought faster mean more pick up. So no need to press so much?!!?

The fuel efficiency of your car still depends of the way you drive.

uhhhh but unburned fuel gonna churn out from ur exhaust.

so choose the most fastest burning fuel??? to eliminate wastage??

i donno but everytime i use petronas,my fuel consumption sarkssss. Persona car.

fap fap fap

+1

since when in /K/ any sh1t makes sense?

Car makers should find a way to recycle the fumes from exhaust as petrol again

yo TS, maybe you should compare between 95 and 97 for the same brand and same amount.
It should give a rough view of whether burns fastest or slowest is the best.
never thought of this method though, even it is a doubtful methodology but still a good idea

+1

kesian hack3line....

so many uncontrolled factor here, oxygen level, AFR, etc. This test prove only one thing. and you know what that is. troll.

anyway profile of video uploader..
http://www.youtube.com/user/keretadotinfo

Profile

Name:kereta
Channel Views: 2,461
Total Upload Views: 505,911
Age: 24
Joined: Apr 9, 2008
Last Visit Date: 3 days ago
Subscribers: 31
Website: http://kereta.info
About Me: admin kereta.info
Country: Malaysia

This post has been edited by hack3line: Jun 2 2011, 12:00 AM

They've found it long time ago. Exhaust Gas Recirculation.

apa ka bangang nak buat comparison minyak enjin kat luar enjin

bang, dalam enjin tu, ada compression ratio, air fuel ratio, lepas tu ada sesetengah enjin guna direct injection, carburetor, so kena jugak tengok dari segi benda2 macam tu

kalau nak buat comparison pun, at least buat dalam satu enjin terkawal, baru ada makna

makasih

the point is why there is a different in burning time ?

variables like oxygen levels, source of ignition, dan byk lagi.

yup EGR

but classical EGR was used primarily for NOx reduction in gasoline engines

on the other hand, EGR equipped with turbocharger will not only reduce NOx emission, but also provide a boost for your engine without using more fuel

plus, additives in the fuels

open air = same oxygen levels
source of ignition = i think its the same (maybe lighter)

hmmm....still differ for 10 secs (petronas & caltex)

Agreed, if done at the same time at the same place, high chances are that the variables are pretty controlled. But I think a fellow forumer this now pointed out which one is for which kind of car. Just don't know how bullshit his statement is.

idk is it the camera's exposure settings + white balance or is it real that the fuel that burns faster has a whiter colour and its brighter, anyone noticed?

haha...

omg, tat means petronas's 1 is not pure de

for me...different is from the engine itself....
this test is not accurate

Different colour due to different chemical reaction by different additives and temperature of burning.

Yes temperate of burning. Directly affected by oxygen level.

i see

So Caltex > All ???

mari belajar ICE

you better watch this...



u better learn this from liang popo

Not necessary, for one, we do not know whether faster fuel combustion means a more efficient energy change (from chemical energy to heat). Also, it is very hard to say that whether faster fuel combustion has anything to do with the energy provided and whether it is cheaper. 1 litre of petronas and 1 litre of caltex may produce 2 different readings of energy provided and energy loss due to the different additives. Also, there will be an optimum condition for combustion too.

Without proper data and knowledge, basically this thread will go nowhere.

quickly burned, less carbon = caltex ron95

slow burning, lots of carbon = petronas ron95

check your muffler tip. after that, you know the best fuel for your car

Just read this article, save your trouble analyzing.

http://christopherteh.com/blog/2011/04/fc/