Ordered a MB-D80 from this seller. It's pre-order so it will be arriving around mid of June. Seems legit to me from the looks of the photo so I'm ok with it

You can read the feedback from his customer. Nobody said that it is original, but they said it is very close to original.

shld i go for 35mm or  50mm 1.8G?

I think it's either 1 or 3 if you're into portraiture. Getting the speedlight would depend if you're into available light photography (no flash) or not.

I would suggest you limit the focal length of your 18-105mm to 50mm (or 85mm) to discipline yourself to shoot at those focal lengths and see which is the one you're most comfortable with. Else, if you get the chance, try out those lenses at shops.

What do you want to achieve? Shooting a wedding?

i) Flashgun - A great partner for lens with small aperture. It does help a lot in dim and low light area.
ii) Batter Grip - If you shoot portrait a lot or need a heavier body to balance up heavy lens, else not necessary.
iii) Tamron 17-50 - You already have 35 and 50 1.8 ! Unless you lazy to change lens

if indoor potrait shooting like the pc fair then better get the flash..
you can already get bokehlicious pictures from your primes.

thats what I think, I also have simliar kit like you.. 

Wah... Everything also want?

There's no one lens that can excel at everything but the 17-55mm f/2.8 does fit the bill to cover most of what you want to do.

It does potrait ok plus sharp and fast focusing too but not at the bokeh that the 85mm f/1.4 can do.

I got all the 3 similar stuff you had mentioned but I don't own the primes which you have. Initially planning to get 50mm f/1.8G. Now, not so necessarily already unless I focus into taking portraiture

50mm f/1.4G is ultimate? ._. as a 50mm f/1.4... it is just so so la...

Do you, by any chance, specifically, sensitively... really... I mean REALLY ??? can feel any different if the lens made from China or Japan other than the words made?

Chill chill... just joking since it's Friday and massive jam coming into the weekend.

1.4 is great, but not that easy to shoot. Last time I used Nikkor 50mm f/1.4, I only comfortable shooting from f/1.8 and above. f/1.4 kinda soft

We do have the same thought, but in totally different situation. I have no prime and only kit, but you have both the 35 and 50 f/1.8 prime

Kenko is a well-known filter manufacturer? I always have a bad thought that their filter is cheap quality stuff. Am sorry for that

I only invest the lens that I need . I may get 85mm f/1.4G but ended up less utilized?

The Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 is good for it's price; Get the non-VC at around RM1250 (official warranty by Tamron Malaysia - 2 Years). Just make sure you test it thoroughly for back-focus or front-focus.
Forget about the VC which need additional > RM500, unless you think you absolutely must have it.
Another alternative is Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 MACRO or Sigma 17-50f/2.8 with OS; both these are more expensive than Tamron.

It's good because you get wide angle for group shot, useful for events. If you're using the 35mm, you will have problem shooting groups (especially big group) and or tight space.

Add a flash, it'll be good to go; That's why you need to consider is it really you need to spend the extra for the VC/VR/OS.
Ultimate? The price is more than double f/1.8 counterpart. For budget/hobbyist who don't earn a lot, that's crucial. For loaded people, or people earning money from photography, then it's different story.

The 50mm f/1.8 is very sharp at f/1.8, plus the price for it, it's amazing deal. Check PhotoMalaysia thread for many poisonous sample.
You've been warned....

i have 50mm f1.4 and its underutilised..
sold it few days back..

its a matter of using vs buying~ 
"biar menang membeli, menang memakai"

That's why I said, whether you really need it; If you know the rules of Shutter Speed, then you should understand how to reduce/avoid shake. With VC, the good thing is you can go below the Shutter Speed up to 4 stops. This is advantage for still subject in lowlight, you can use slow shutter speed handheld.

With prime lens, like 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, there's NO VC/VR/OS; Old lens have no VC/VR/OS, yet people take amazing pictures. It's all about knowing how to utilize your equipment and not too rely on technology.
Technology advancement is to "HELP" provide  or "improve" on something, not to be abuse by relying on it. Technology helps to improve lifestyle, reduce our workload, makes it easier to do things. As with VC/VR/OS, it's give the advantage for people to use it when they want/need it, but it's not a "must". It's should become something that is a "must" until cannot live without it. It's something that is "nice" to have.

So, there's no wrong or right; If you feel it will help you, and you feel it's worth spending the extra RM500++ for the VC, then by all means go ahead; I have nothing against VC or non-VC, it depends on individual preference. Those prefer VC have his/her own reasoning to get it, and he/she feels worth it; For those that think he/she doesn't need it, and/or feel not worth the price, will disagree to get it; It'll never ending debate because it really depends on how one person feel, think and value things, there's no wrong or right here.

If you research on it, you may find comments/reviews that the non-VC is slightly sharper than the VC; then again, it depends how important is the "difference" to you and if you pixel peep. To some, the sharpness difference can mean a lot, some may say "ok (with the) lah". Again, individual preference. As for problems, there's also complains that the VC has more issues, but then, I'm not really sure.

sb700 is kinda like upgrade version of sb600.. I recommend get tht instead.
some more info about sb700 here http://flashraw.com/review-nikon-sb-700-speedlight/

^ good for you bro.. Im targetting for that one too.. after receiving my July paycheck tho..

If you don't have any wide angle lens, and you're on budget, tamron is a good choice for its price, providing f/2.8 from 17-50mm range; useful for events.
For events shooting, usually we try not to use too slow shutter (shooting people, etc), so VC may not be useful plus you need to wait for the VC to kick in first. But shooting still subject (e.g. wedding rings, objects), and in low light and no flash, the VC can come in handy for you to use slower shutter speed handheld.

If you feel worth to pay the extra, RM500++ to for the VC, then go ahead;
There's always 2 side of the coins:
1. Didn't get the VC, later regret when you feel you need it, should've paid the extra money and get the VC.
2. Got the VC, later feel you don't really utilize it (plus you need to wait for the VC to kick in), you regret for spending the extra money, you could've invest on something else (e.g. Flash).
Well, it depends on your budget, if you're low budget (don't earn a lot of money) and this is a hobby, the amount difference is a lot; But for those who can afford, they would probably just get the VC version.

So, no worries, test it out and decide yourself, most important if you are satisfied with it.
Btw, there're Tamron lens that made in China and those that made in Japan; look out for it. Get official set (with 2 years warranty from Futuromic) for less hassle and better support.

There're wedding photogs using the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8; In the end, when you look at the picture, most (if not all) people can't tell it's taken with which lens anyway. More importantly, is the skill, technique, creativity, etc.

Anyway, non VC still can take still subject, you just need to understand the shutter speed rule.
Just in case you're not sure:
If you zoom to 50mm, the actual focal length for crop sensor is 1.5X, so 50mm X 1.5 = 75mm; Thus your minimum recommended shutter speed must not be slower than 1/80. Try shoot at faster shutter speed. If you use slower shutter speed, you need to hold the camera very steadily.
NOTE: It doesn't mean you can shake the camera la, just that holding it properly, the recommended shutter speed should eliminate the shake problem.

See your budget, the test out those lens within your budget.