QUOTE(ShrugsLova @ Jun 12 2012, 12:09 AM)
I have gotten a scholarship to study in SG and will depart this august. Thank for your concern. Right now, I'm still working to get enough pocket money for the traveling fees and such.
Just want to summarize/share some opinion of mine:
1) Don't waste time doing PhD if you're aiming for money. In term of cash, experience will be forever on top of PhD.
2) PhD does open more opportunity, but I can't say it is a better one.
3) Only go for PhD, if you have a strong interest in the field you're taking. Also, the mentality to stay 'student' for the next 4 years. Forget about buying assets/marriage in this 4 years period.
4) 4 years commitment is not short, don't start if you're not sure. I don't want you to waste your time+money and stop half way.
5) If you're not sure what you want, opt to work first (you can stop anytime you want) then only decide. Don't go the other way round (PhD need 4 years commitment). Also, by working first, you will cherish your PhD more - provided if you're a research lover.
6) I'd agree with a forumer; PhD does change your lifestyle. At least, you'll be labelled as nerd for another 4 years.
7) Lastly, follow your heart. It can't be wrong.
Just some comments:
I still don't understand why people separate "work experience" from "PhD". Judging from the many comments in this thread, I dare say that most people haven't been through the process of obtaining a PhD itself, much less understanding the structure of PhD and what it really is about.
Unless you are doing some highly theoretical stuff that bears no resemblance to the work done in real life, PhD is itself a working experience. In fact, a much more difficult experience since you will ultimately be the one to carry the responsibility for your project and will be contributing actively to generating ideas for the project along with your supervisor, rather than just given a task to perform and following orders from your superior.
To be honest I don't see which transferable skills that could be gained by working outside of academia cannot be obtained through PhD. An ideal PhD experience should be one that "forces" you to learn:
- effective time management (since you'll be handling multiple projects, and will be working longer hours than normal jobs)
- workstyle with enhanced productivity (you'll need to generate the data needed in limited time)
- ability to absorb and analyse large complex sets of data
- critical thinking skills and the ability to synthesise arguments/hypotheses logically
- ability to apply theoretical knowledge and translate them into practical solutions
- ability to research a particular topic efficiently (and that means a lot of reading in a short period of time, usually involving the learned ability to distinguish valuable information from useless crap within a large body of literature)
- oral and written presentation skills
etc. all of which are transferable and applicable to your work and lifestyle.
That is the reason why you'll see PhD holders, in generally, can easily outperform the fresh grads, even though they start out together at the lower ranks. Usually, the PhD holders are better in project management and coordination, and are usually more productive and takes less time to learn new stuffs.
(Of course, individual experience may differ, and may not comply to what I've written. I've seen quite a lot of "bad/incompetent" PhD holders as well. Also, since there are so many "mediocre" universities nowadays producing PhDs that aren't properly trained, compared to a few decades ago where the number of PhD candidates is much less, there have been a rise in the number of PhD holders who just couldn't perform like they should have been. It also depends very much on your supervisor/mentor in training you and preparing you for independence in your later life.)
Most people who didn't proceed to PhD is due to one or more of the following reasons:
1) Simply not interested
2) Failed to obtain a scholarship/sponsorship - grades not competitive enough to secure a scholarship
3) Undecided, like you said because of the commitment
However, beware though by choosing to work first one can find it hard to return to the academia and start their PhD. I have written at length about this before (probably in this thread), but mostly because as you grow older many things start to change in your life - marriage, children, mortgage etc., and it could reach a point where supporting your family and yourself with stipends alone (easily only half as much, or even less than what you would already be earning) is simply not feasible.
Regarding lifestyle: Yes, it does change your lifestyle. In fact, it
is a lifestyle by itself. You
will sacrifice a lot of your social life, this is very true. But that is also the challenge: to achieve a work-life balance, you will have to learn how to manage your life properly, such that you can both be productive but at the same time still get a decent amount of social life.
And finally, I wouldn't say most people doing PhD are nerds. In fact, those that I've come across just seem like normal people to me.
This post has been edited by tester: Jun 23 2012, 11:03 PM