QUOTE(The Jedi @ Nov 18 2012, 01:31 PM)
Not true, one still can access to d'alpina and 16sierra using skve and no jam
i mean the junction going equine. during peak hours
Added on November 18, 2012, 2:24 pmQUOTE(xyyap @ Nov 18 2012, 01:52 PM)
In fact, there is nothing wrong with leasehold.
But if most properties @ Cyberjaya is freehold, then those leasehold will not be the preferred choice.
Agree?
so far ony 1 piece of prop in CBJ is leasehold.
V-Residence by MacVilla Sdn. Bhd,. that land doesn't belongs to Setia Haruman neither does Cyberview. that location is not really cyberjaya but they declare the proejct as cyber. next to a big pylon HTC
Added on November 18, 2012, 2:26 pmQUOTE(MrHunter @ Nov 18 2012, 02:11 PM)
Slightly different view here. If mct prices the landed reasonable like 600 to 700k eventhough higher density many ll grad it like no tom. I think many ownstayers are looking for this price range gng fh dslh. But if they want to price like seg sh or sejati then gd luck! The density itself doesnt justify the price tag not to say pr1ma(if it is true) there. Developers nowadays need to be sensible or else it ll be stucked.
exactly. but heard from MCT that this will be zero lot bungalow so wont b 6-700k furthermore, the gap of this plan is a little too big
bungalow vs Pr1ma.........
This post has been edited by cybertechmkteo: Nov 18 2012, 02:26 PM