Call Of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Yawn.
Call Of Duty : Modern Warfare 3, Yawn.
|
|
Nov 8 2011, 07:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
wtb mw3 second hand
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2011, 07:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2011, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
SO how was the MW3 team play so far? Does it become like Battlefield? Public server all the way. LOL.
|
|
|
Nov 9 2011, 07:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2011, 09:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
both gay. gow da man
|
|
|
Nov 12 2011, 04:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
OMG, I can't believe lot of people having fun with this game.
Positive - Good navigation menu, lot more responsive and fluid compare to battlefield. I always curse when in Battlefield navigation menu. - Can I say it has catchy graphic? just because it shows lot more warfare gadget and great cut scene. The graphic quality as overall is comparable for both. Negative (To the point it turn me off, totally!) - The control is a TOTAL EMBARRASSING when to think that people still want to compare it with Battlefield. It has a really arcade style game play. I complained that Battlefield has a very bad campaign but with this crappy control, I can't even pass half and hour play the campaign, no matter how good the story is. It's just not enjoying. - Bad matchmaking system. Having hard time to find a game. But with battlefield, it's just a second and you're in game. I'm no fanboy for any of the franchise as both are my first experience with warfare games. Definitely one of my regret purchase. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 14 2011, 02:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(elasticote @ Nov 14 2011, 01:52 PM) if u play COD series 1st, u will say otherwise.. :/ that's just my initial feeling about it. but i dont think which one first really the case. it's preference, not first impression.COD Black Ops doesnt have any issues about multiplayer matchmaking, in MW3 i think they do that to force us to buy 'Elite Club'.. that sucks.. :/ byw, i'm still have some hope for it. gonna give few more hours to it and see if that will change. |
|
|
Nov 14 2011, 02:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2011, 09:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
After few more hours of frustrating time in campaign veteran mode. I think I can adopt the play style. What I'm thinking, "Yeah, not that bad actually. Kind of fun!"
Just had one opportunity to be in multiplayer team deathmatch but turns out soo bad laggy. Hope it can be better next time. QUOTE(madcrow @ Nov 15 2011, 06:39 PM) Why does the graphics look a bit 'retarded' in MP? Is it because my of the lag (two bars when playing) or...? +1. Feels like playing Counter Strike >< |
|
|
Nov 16 2011, 07:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
408 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
If I understand it correctly, the matchmaking works by searching for the fastest host available with min 150ms lag. So it happen that the fastest host available is always coming from own country.
Even if you're the host in a game, next session they might change the host if another person in your game has better ping. |
| Change to: | 0.0248sec
0.33
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 06:03 AM |