Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ☆☆☆ Tires Discussion Thread V2✰✰✰, welcome re002☆csc5☆asymmetric2!

views
     
earl-ku
post Dec 26 2012, 03:50 PM

Chlorophiliac
*******
Senior Member
4,587 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Golden Meadow
QUOTE(CocoMonGo @ Dec 5 2012, 10:34 PM)
yeah took me awhile to figure that out  tongue.gif
I will try to source for the C Drive 2 after I saw quite a lot of favorable comments on it. Seems it would be a better deal them michelin XM2.
*
QUOTE(mytaffeta @ Dec 18 2012, 04:08 AM)
i drive same as yours, so what would you recommend? 195/50/16 what brand produce this size?
*
QUOTE(Thrust @ Dec 21 2012, 08:24 AM)
On 2nd thoughts, I think better to stick to 185/55/16. I saw another City using Falken ZE912 195/50/16, the tyre looks like a fat donut  sweat.gif

I will go for Michelin XM2 since they have the native size of 185/55/16. It cost RM285 for a donut.
*
I drive 2011 city too... was on achiles sport atr 195/50/16 but today had a flat and the flat was combi of nail and a burst tyre... flat was caused by burst tyre and appears under inflated

Scout around and my tyre shop says only tyre available is stock tyre but bigger in size...

Falken ziex thread usage fast... yokohama r01 only 2 piece left... xm2 no stock

No choice so going back to conti cpc2 195/50/16 at rm290 a piece

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0689sec    0.33    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 08:47 PM