QUOTE(efaceninja @ Dec 30 2013, 08:17 PM)
bro, maybe the tread wear is not the sole indication on tyre performance...? for example the NCT5 tread wear 240, most ppl on forum claim is very noisy, whereas most ppl claim XM2 is quiet
when ppl say XM2 good performance.. i'm sure those guys are not extreme petrolheads, they don't normally drive too fast. even if driving fast is only on straight road. if the tyre doesn't skid during normal corner, normal raining slippery road/corner, doesn't skid when hard braking, then, i think those guys (me included) will say its good performance, maybe the actual term should be "good enough" performance. Good enough for normal citizens.
hmm... maybe its a way that michelin trying to say that "my entry level tyre is better/on par with my competitor's mid range tyre".. haha.. maybe same reason why ppl buy toyota and bash potong
i think your views are somewhat constrained to treadwear rating and entry range, mid range.
agreed, treadwear is not the sole indication on tyre (and NVH) performance.when ppl say XM2 good performance.. i'm sure those guys are not extreme petrolheads, they don't normally drive too fast. even if driving fast is only on straight road. if the tyre doesn't skid during normal corner, normal raining slippery road/corner, doesn't skid when hard braking, then, i think those guys (me included) will say its good performance, maybe the actual term should be "good enough" performance. Good enough for normal citizens.
hmm... maybe its a way that michelin trying to say that "my entry level tyre is better/on par with my competitor's mid range tyre".. haha.. maybe same reason why ppl buy toyota and bash potong
i think your views are somewhat constrained to treadwear rating and entry range, mid range.
thing is, i do have few friends/users i met at tire shop(s) whom i chat with, do feedback that XM2 is not as quiet as most *INITIAL feedback* on LYN post/threads.
the general feedback i get is after 30-50% usage the tire noise will start to grow/deteriorate until it's no different than your regular cheapo tire.
and when it comes to performance, if according to what you described, then the other entry level tires are just as good as XM2 is for a fraction or even HALF it's price.
but yeah you put it best on the toyota and proton part: EVERYONE praise the WORLD on how good is toyota, and talks shit about proton. however when facts are demanded, no one can properly serve them without any bias.
and no i'm not constrained to just treadwear rating, because when you compare mid range tires from other competitor, they absolutely destroys xm2 with a fraction of a price.
my PERSONAL opinion on treadwear is that i do not prefer hard compound. treadwear means little to me as i prefer not to skimp on tire spending as i do drive very aggressively. again, it is my personal opinion that as your rubber tires are the ONLY thing between your vehicle and the road surface, it is essential that one pays extra attention to it.
also: http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Michelin/Energy-XM2.htm
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre-Type/Pas...-Touring-Tyres/
even the c drive 2 that people don't favor because of the poor treadwear is better than the xm2 overall.
and the above, is an example of some minor attempt at providing facts. not just "OH ITS DAMN GOOD" but how good? no one friggin knows. no one even bother providing follow up feedback/review when they wear their tires down or when shit happens that make them regret their purchase.
Dec 30 2013, 08:39 PM

Quote
0.0565sec
0.73
7 queries
GZIP Disabled