Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

English Clubs Liverpool Football Club - The Kop Talks 2011, Official :Henderson SIGNED!!!

views
     
SGSuser
post May 14 2011, 10:07 PM

In your way
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: 4.2105° N, 101.9758° E


QUOTE(leaF @ May 14 2011, 10:02 PM)
congratz for ur team for winning the 19th title ..but we only feel tired after holding this title for 20years ++ next year we are going to take it back =)
*
fair play mate, and good luck with that, coz we intend to keep it as long as we can smile.gif
SGSuser
post May 15 2011, 02:05 PM

In your way
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: 4.2105° N, 101.9758° E


QUOTE(hyperyouth_firepower @ May 15 2011, 02:00 PM)
mathemathically Man.City is now 4th, and presumably stay that way. The only way for Liverpool or Spurs to win the 4th spot is the other 2 teams must lose, and the 'aspiring' team must win.
*
lol, didnt knew you werent updated with table after.........nvm kthxbye laugh.gif
SGSuser
post May 15 2011, 02:10 PM

In your way
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: 4.2105° N, 101.9758° E


QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 15 2011, 02:07 PM)
You said people asked you to leave the thread. Now look at what kind of post you posting and what so surprising people asking you to leave their thread?

Meaningless one liner. If you have nothing to post, dont post at all. You think this is /k?
*
it was the same even if it's not a one liner post...im gonna leave "your" thread now bye.gif
SGSuser
post May 16 2011, 01:32 AM

In your way
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: 4.2105° N, 101.9758° E


QUOTE(hfi @ May 16 2011, 01:16 AM)
Not sure why you guys are blaming Webb. It wasn't his fault we played badly. Because he didn't take pity on how poorly we played and provide us some sort of incentives to rob the win off Spurs ? We played badly and Spurs were clearly the better team.

Our central mid were outmuscled and outpaced. Our strikers seem to fumble at the slightest contact. Both Maxi and Kuyt were not at their usual game, Kuyt in particular was a little sluggish and sloppy on the ball.

Just one of those bad days in the office. Good thing the season coming to an end. I will be disappointed if we finished 6th.
*
exactly..if liverpool could have gotten a goal, then maybe that would be a stronger case..but they didn't.. 0-2 down at home with 35+ minutes to play, have every chance to get back into the game, but spurs defence was great and pool attack was not... talk about lost motivation while there was still plenty of time, that is not the liverpool team i knew, more like finding excuses and scapegoats to blame in this case webb

saw the foul, it very close, just and just outside the box..webb might have seen it on the line, so he gave the pen...then again the foul itself is 50-50, shoulder to shoulder collision like this shouldnt be a foul but we have seen plenty of them given
SGSuser
post May 16 2011, 01:50 AM

In your way
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: 4.2105° N, 101.9758° E


QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 01:36 AM)
Quote:

You have to look back... When was the last time we get back into games and lead the game after conceded 2 goals? And you are telling me this wont affect the motivation when we conceded the 2nd goal late in the game?

Shoulder and shoulder collision?Really? Mate I think you have to look at the replay again before you post.

Pienaar bumped into Flanno intentionally and fell to the ground himself. You tell me that's a penalty?

How hard is it to admit Webb gave the wrong decision? If we can admit Suarez should  be sent off, why cant you guys, despite being a rival fan, give some neutral opinion and let's not let your hatred control you and give some bias opinion.
*
Jesus, do u read? I never said that was a pen..it was a shoulder to shoulder charge(ive seen enough, no need for more replays), shouldnt be a foul at all but we have seen plenty of it given, and it's just outside the box..so yeah it shouldnt be a penalty, do i need to explain it bit by bit to you? Christ sake doh.gif

and i said getting back into the game, that doesnt mean leading ffs...35 minutes + stoppage time, at home in front of the kop, and you saying that you have no chance of getting back into the game? well it can go either way, you might be demotivated and just throw in the towel or you can be motivated because your team just got an unfair decision, in this case you claim it was the former and blame it mainly on the ref, that's just not how i see it

QUOTE
And you are telling me this wont affect the motivation when we conceded the 2nd goal late in the game?

late? only the 56th minute and you tell me it's late? what a joke...how hard is it to admit that your players did not do enough to get back into the game, let alone winning it
SGSuser
post May 16 2011, 02:32 AM

In your way
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: 4.2105° N, 101.9758° E


QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 02:04 AM)
The way you put is quite rightly defending Webb when it was clearly his fault for awarding a dubious penalty. The fact that you put up statement about a lot of such situations referee awarded penalties mean that you are already defending Webb and denying that's entirely his fault.
*
well, just to make it clear, i wasnt defending him, i wasnt making excuses for webb, those are just my pov that might be the reason why webb gave it, and i did say it shouldnt be given, so let's not make assumption on behalf of me just because you like it that way smile.gif (oops)

QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 02:04 AM)
Ok, I misunderstood your meaning of getting back into the game but to us, this is a must win game and thus I automatically assume getting back means winning it. Conceding at 56th min of the game already sealed our fate entirely.Mathematically, we have 34minutes and not 35...and Yes, you may have 5 mins stoppage time... (ok, maybe 11 for Sir Alex at OT...oops, joking there.) but when you come against a solid defenders in the name of Dawson and King, what are the chances of you scoring one, let alone two?
*
conceeding at 56th minute, plus stoppage time, so it's 35+, if u want to argue about 1 minute, okay i'll minus 1 minute for it to be 34++, satisfied? biggrin.gif
can't score against king and dawson at home when you have the talisman suarez and the record breaking 35m pound carrol? not to mention the machine kuyt and the maxi who scored hat tricks recently(but was called shit today by some1)? come on dont look so down upon your team la..ok la, dont say the 34++ minutes when you claim your players become "demotivated" already, how bout the 56 minutes? cant score a goal also? last time at OT against us(eventual 19 time champions) u were able to come back from 2-0 down away to draw, that was something right? although Berba's hat trick later sealed the deal la.. but maybe you can argue no gerrard to play this time(and to kiss the camera) maybe he could have made a difference(or maybe not)


QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 02:04 AM)
Playing at home doesn't mean anything. You can still lose games regardless of where you play.Remember, 1-4 at OT?  No doubt playing at home might boost a little in terms of cheers and support from the crowd but at the end of the day, the decision of the referee affects the result of the game more than anything else.
In case you didnt know , I did admit Spurs were the better team. And you can check out their thread and my posts if you want. So lets not make assumption on behalf of me just because you like it that way. smile.gif
*
playing at home does mean a thing, if it doesnt then why premier league requires us to play both home and away? might as well juz play lucky draw la, see who gets home and who gets away then play once enough...of coz it doesnt guarantee a win, i never said u guys could have won this game anyway..remember again getting back into the game doesnt mean winning..of coz the ref made an impact, any decisions small or big he made will make an impact..but rather than blaming it on the ref, which we all do sometimes, was it the main reason pool lost? hmm.gif so you may see it that way, but i don't.. difference of opinion, nothing new between fans of two clubs, that's all smile.gif
SGSuser
post May 16 2011, 03:39 AM

In your way
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: 4.2105° N, 101.9758° E


QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 02:51 AM)
Your point of view was bias and with every intention to defend Webb. That wasn't assumption , that's fact.
*
and that coming from a liverpool fan, cant blame you for assuming anything you like though, and the inability differentiate what are facts and what are not

QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 02:51 AM)
Having your best players around does not necessarily mean you are going to win. Losing your key players does not necessarily mean you are going to lose either. Need example? Us, playing without Gerrard and Torres sometimes ago still managed to beat a team of united. Need anymore example? Us, playing with our 57m strikeforce, yet we still lose the game at home ground.

Again, just because you have the best players, just because you are playing at home doesnt mean anything. They just slightly increase your chances of scoring/winning. And dont forget, these players are not robot, they have their off days too. So what makes you think they will score against an in form Dawson and King? Their price tag? Maybe you should spend sometime off internet and listen to Jessie J's price tag. Forget about the price tag. Hernandez costs as much as 7m and he scored more goals than 50m Torres.Get what I mean?
*
again and again, why always bring up winning, you are not charlie sheen are you?...all i was saying was that liverpool have every chance to get back into the game with the time left, is that not right? every fan here knows it, 0-2 down home or away with that time available left the game is not over, not rocket science isnt it? and those price tags doesnt matter, i just want to be more specific brows.gif

QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 02:51 AM)
This is the funny part. You guys ask us not to look back the past and you keep bringing in past records of us managing to equalize and bring game back to life. Gimme a break.
*
aiya i see you brought up the past, i brought it up also la, itu pon kecoh rclxub.gif

QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 02:51 AM)
How hard is it to understand that playing at home just increases your chances of winning/scoring. It does not GUARANTEE that you will score or win a match.

Like I said, if it doesnt guarantee you scoring, what makes you think we will be able to get back into game just because we are playing at home?  wink.gif
*
you are getting way off the point here, 'liverpool still has every chance to get back into the game' and 'liverpool playing at home, surely will score and win' gives a different meaning..never have i said home advantage guarantees goals, wth? is it so hard to fathom that the game is not at all over even after modric scored the penalty? if you think it's all over at that point, then it's a pity sad.gif

"has every chance to get back into the game considering that there's still so much time left and the fact that you guys are at home"...read this again and again

QUOTE(solstice818 @ May 16 2011, 02:51 AM)
Maybe you miss out but I dont mind to show you and remind you that, we did admit that we were playing poorly today. Some of us even admitted that KD made wrong tactical change. So, maybe next time, you should check out our posts before pointing out that we blamed entirely on referee for losing the match.

From the very beginning, all I wanted to point out is that Webb's decision might have change the outcome of the game. Never in my post, I said that Webb caused us to lose the game. Period. If you cant understand that, pitiful for you then because it's not that hard to understand this simple point I m making, eh?
*
lol...i said mainly, not entirely, maybe you should read again, and again, and again coz you have a habit of twisting other people's words with when you dont read well..and i already agreed with you that webb decision had an impact, but i just didnt think it was the main reason liverpool couldnt get back into the game.. because your thread came up with all those webb insults again, cant blame me for thinking that you lot were blaming the ref mainly for the loss right? if it wasn't, then ok my fault, though i do think it was biggrin.gif there are other reasons of course, perhaps, like you said, KD made the wrong tactical move? or perhaps the nude guy caused some distraction and the players got aroused and couldnt get the image off their mind? laugh.gif

plus my first post wasnt even meant specifically at you anyway...pity you if you thought it was...ok that's it for now, you can pm me if you want to continue..though i guess you'll still reply me here again just coz this is "your thread" and you do seem to like "winning".. but that's really all from me today so buhbye and sleep tight bye.gif
SGSuser
post Jun 9 2011, 07:59 PM

In your way
*******
Senior Member
2,449 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: 4.2105° N, 101.9758° E


QUOTE(Rotuham @ Jun 9 2011, 07:43 PM)
http://www.sportsnewsireland.com/soccer_irish/30771/

Lol.This is what happens when you hijack other club's deal. rclxms.gif
*
ohmy.gif shocking.gif sad.gif cry.gif

nah, he would not even be joining the u-21 squad for the euros(which he did) if he had failed the medical

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1048sec    0.64    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 11:19 PM