Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Katsura Hinagiku from Hayate No Gotoku (Nendoroid), ハヤテのごとくの桂ヒナギク

views
     
TSgoldfries
post May 3 2011, 05:55 PM, updated 15y ago

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




This is the Nendoroid version of Katsura Hinagiku (桂ヒナギク) from Hayate No Gotoku (ハヤテのごとく). As you can see from the setup photo, it's a small subject.

user posted image
ハヤテのごとくの桂ヒナギク | Katsura Hinagiku from Hayate No Gotoku (Nendoroid version) by goldfries, on Flickr

biggrin.gif

Canon EOS 60D was used for this shot, lens of choice was the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro lens due to incredible flexibility when it comes to the MFD.

EXIF - f/6.3 | 1/100 | ISO200. Wireless Flash using 60D pop up. Group A & B were used.

Flashes used were 2 units of Canon 430EX II and 1 unit of 580EX II.

user posted image
Setup for the shoot - ハヤテのごとくの桂ヒナギク | Katsura Hinagiku from Hayate No Gotoku (Nendoroid version) by goldfries, on Flickr

I decided to go into more detail from this shot, my Suzumiya Haruhi bunny girl photo was taken against a brown box background which was pretty simple. I decided to do it differently this time, even the lighting setup was totally different.

For the background, I decided that it has to be pin, seeing that Hinagiku is generally PINK already.

I have some pink / white bougainvillea plants outside but due to the heat of the noon day sun and the inconsistent cloud and all - this was not the path so back into the house. I then remember that there's his this dark purple / maroon colored articial flower arrangement around some place so I decided to have this as the background. Behind the flower, I decided that it should be white which I think both complement each other very well.

The main reason on why flowers were used as background was to show the feminine side of the character. Just in case you wonder why I didn't use f/2.8 and bokeh it as much as possible - Here are 2 reasons
1) I want sufficient DOF on my character
2) I want it to be decently distinct as flowers, having it creamy wouldn't make sense. It'll be mostly pink blotches.

smile.gif Through out the process, I took about a hundred shots and spent about 2 hours. YUP! And you guys think this was easy? Heh.

OK Let's go into the details. Flashes from left to right are 430EX II (Group A), 430EX II (center, Group B) and 580EX II (Group A). The 430EX II units were mounted with mini softboxes. The big one on the left to give more coverage of light while the center unit was using the smaller softbox, sufficient to provide diffused light from the front.

The bulk of my shots was to find the angle I like and also the lighting that I like.

I experimented a lot with the figurine's position against the background, and it involved quite a lot of re-arrangement to the flowers, to get it to fit nicely in the frame while capturing the character. Yes, it was intentionally done with the lower left being open area for text and such.

The flower had to be sufficiently lit to bring some lighter shade of it, from maroon-like color to turn out pink. This was done by pointing the 580EX II to the flower and background. Initially it was on the same level as the flower but it cast shadows on the white cloth that I hung over the LCD TV. At a later point, I raised it to a higher level to eliminate the shadow.

Due to the group limitation of the flash where the flash on the left is sharing the same intensity as the 580EX II (Group A) to light the background. This involves moving the flash closer and further to adjust as one of the ways to adjust intensity. Group B is stationary, ratio adjusted as necessary.

In the end, Group A's intensity was about 1/8 -1/3 while Group B was at 1/128. Interesting to note - the 430EX II has the lowest power of 1/64 so I have no idea how 1/128 +1/3 translates but hey, the output was what I like so I'm just reading to you what's on my setting.

Now, as for the EXIF itself - f/6.3 | 1/100 | ISO200

Why 1/100 and ISO200? Why not 1/250 | ISO100 | f/8 - 11 or something? Due to the limitation of the flash groups I have, I wanted to get as much of the background light as possible.

I didn't bother with the rule of the shutter speed, 100mm on a 60D comes to about 160mm but if you're stable enough then going lower is not a problem - case in point, I'm using 1/100.

ISO200 and f/6.3 also to get as much light from the background as possible.

As you can see the shot is at a 16:9 ratio smile.gif I intended for it to be my wallpaper but it's rather desktop unfriendly. tongue.gif

I normally shoot in RAW but for my figurine shoots - I like to shoot in JPG for training purpose. Same in this case, it's shot in JPG. No adjustment in color, contrast or anything at all. I only cropped it to 16:9 ratio (width to width) and cloned the defects on the figurine. I spent more time on the beautifying the text with the logo.

Thank you for reading - I may rephrase the above should I find the need to. wink.gif
0168257061
post May 3 2011, 06:13 PM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


abang, in my monitor, the nendoroid is a bit overexposed liao.
TSgoldfries
post May 3 2011, 06:34 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




how's your monitor? calibrated?

regardless the left side (her hair) is on the bright side. smile.gif bring the shine to her hair. i use the face as measure for exposure.
Tony Stark
post May 3 2011, 06:45 PM

Jarvis where are you?
******
Senior Member
1,883 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
nice one goldie. but me oso see abit over exposed. maybe the light coming from the left side is a tad too bright. it kinda washes of some details. just my humble opinion notworthy.gif

but i really love the background setup. brings in the mode perfectly. lovely thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by Tony Stark: May 3 2011, 06:47 PM
nanogen
post May 3 2011, 06:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
188 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


erm..can i express my noob opinion also?

it does look a bit over to me on the hair part...but i actually LOVE the shots (the concept and workflow)
TSgoldfries
post May 3 2011, 07:09 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




thanks guys. left side was left to be that bright on purpose, giving greater impact from light to shadow.

the left side of her body are all lit by the same light. if i were to make the hair less bright, the left part of her face and body will dim together, especially her blouse (on the arm) and the skirt.

end up the figure looks less attractive. so i have a choice - hair vs face and body.smile.gif i decided to go for brightened hair, furthermore i love the tone from white to pink.

power for light on the left sharing same ratio as the one for background makes it a little tricky as well.


Added on May 3, 2011, 7:12 pmoh yeah the left light also lights up part of the background.

still got a bunch of figurines to shoot. smile.gif
0168257061
post May 3 2011, 07:20 PM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


A bunch ah. then do share more biggrin.gif
TSgoldfries
post May 3 2011, 07:27 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




sure thing! you guys can apply the concept here for human portrait shoots too. smile.gif
Tony Stark
post May 3 2011, 08:25 PM

Jarvis where are you?
******
Senior Member
1,883 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(goldfries @ May 3 2011, 07:27 PM)
sure thing! you guys can apply the concept here for human portrait shoots too. smile.gif
*
its great that u teach and show how u get it done here. this is good stuuf, good info. after all, understanding photography is understanding light. nice one goldie! notworthy.gif
Jeffrey1987
post May 3 2011, 08:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,661 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Love it so much . . . great job!!!
Decky
post May 3 2011, 09:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,190 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Great job! I like how the left side of the hair was intentionally overexposed to give it that realistic 'feel'
0168257061
post May 3 2011, 11:15 PM

EimiFukada
********
All Stars
14,242 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: JAVABUS


so in a pitch dark night I can use the flash to lit up Background as well ? ;p
TSgoldfries
post May 4 2011, 12:54 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




of course you can. smile.gif
nicotine
post May 4 2011, 02:35 AM

Raging Storm
*******
Senior Member
3,669 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: ze deep blue ocean

eh abang emas.. beside highlight on hair... the background a lil bit busy or cluttered it steal the focus of my eyes. my eyes tend to focus on teh left hand side where there a big white just right above the jap character.

my 2 noob cent
TSgoldfries
post May 4 2011, 02:45 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




thanks. smile.gif i'm not expecting all praises here. even in my photo, I'm working with limitations vs my own expectations. biggrin.gif

lacking flower + want an area for writing = what you saw there. smile.gif if have additional flower, i could possibly cover there but I think like this more natural la.

yes, the background looks busy. some say better it darker. some say better it's blur. i didn't want it bokeh out because I want it that you can still more or less see that it's some flowers.

didn't want to darken the background either as it looks gloomy and unnatural. I decided to go with the more noisy background but with color being stronger than subject. biggrin.gif and purposely framed the flowers around her.
Hexlord
post May 4 2011, 09:57 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
991 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


Thanks for sharing! My shots of figu have been till this point in time, taken using natural light. I have a few experienced figu shooters using all sorts of lighting modifiers, so I can appreciate the trouble taken to get the shots done.


kalakatu
post May 4 2011, 12:37 PM

Insanely Addictive
*******
Senior Member
2,323 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Somewhere I Belong



looks a bit overexposed on my monitor too.. and a bit too sharp for me..
but i totally love the color!
TSgoldfries
post May 4 2011, 01:12 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




thanks all! smile.gif

too sharp? I didn't sharpen oh. it's default, resized and upload only. biggrin.gif

IMO the term overexposed / underexposed should be used for entire frame rather than the subject, going based on the comment - if it's the hair part, I think the term should be "blown highlights" or "overblown highlights".

nevertheless I appreciate all visits and comments, getting to know people's preference. for my preference, the strong light was to bring in the tone and the contrast.

notworthy.gif to all who come here. most importantly, I'm happy to see the sharing is helpful to others.
IMHO
post May 14 2011, 12:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
hi..i m newbei oso.
i find the highligh make is so natural n life-like. drool.gif
good effort.

This post has been edited by IMHO: May 14 2011, 12:08 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0205sec    0.29    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 10:32 PM