Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Removed

views
     
ma43q
post May 12 2011, 11:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,820 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
this review helped me to decide for the u2711. very informative.
ma43q
post May 16 2011, 07:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,820 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
to me, i dont feel that it is necessary to wait for the LED backlight version if one is in need of a monitor and LED backlight is not a must have feature when i buy a monitor.
ma43q
post May 23 2011, 09:32 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,820 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
received my u2711 last wednesday. the color reproduction is superd and in a totally different league compared to my old samsung t220 (actually not even worth comparing). i do not notice any bleeding but i was not really paying much attention to that. I was too busy testing out the dragon age 2, dawn of war 2 and civilization V with max settings. smile.gif

This post has been edited by ma43q: May 23 2011, 09:33 AM
ma43q
post May 23 2011, 11:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,820 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(Searingmage @ May 23 2011, 12:13 PM)
Just wondering, why you opt for U2711H? For that price, you can go for tri-monitor set up with U2311H..
Cause, I feel that's more worth the value.. Though, I do believe U2711H is a better monitor since it's a TRUE IPS panel, not e-IPS.
*
i prefer a single larger monitor than tri-monitor setup (u2311h x 3) with borders in between due to the frames on the monitors. by the way, my work desk has limited space and i don't like it too crowded. i had uploaded the photos of my system in this thread http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1638975/+760 (look at post # 764).

Anyway, perhaps u feel it is better value for the money but for me, that is not a deciding factor. For me to spend that much of money, i think i'm no longer thinking whether it is value for money or not but rather, the satisfaction of owning one.

3 x u2311h will run at the resolution of 5760 x 1080. Even my hd6990 will be hard pressed to run at that resolution in some games (with everything maxed out) unless i add an extra hd6970 . I prefer to run at a resolution whereby i can max out everything, without have to worry about lagging and my graphic card can provide me with a smooth gaming experience and I can enjoy the best graphic quality the games can offer.

This post has been edited by ma43q: May 23 2011, 11:59 AM
ma43q
post May 24 2011, 07:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,820 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(Sadrax @ May 23 2011, 10:19 PM)
nice reviews  thumbup.gif
dell is top rated and samsung is top sales..
both are good monitor
*
if you compare both, i would say the difference is significant in terms of color reproduction. i had a 1.5 years old t220 and the ultrasharp is just in another league.
ma43q
post May 26 2011, 02:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,820 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
enjoy your new monitor. smile.gif

This post has been edited by ma43q: May 26 2011, 02:39 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0139sec    1.04    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 08:32 AM