Nope. HTML 4.1

Source
N8 Specifications

Btw, I tried LG Optimus 7 at Bangsar and woah, I must say the Windows Phone UI is pretty sleek.
Might be a good thing Nokia's taking Windows Phone to be the choice of OS but I must say the current running version sure do seem overly simplified and lack of features and damn, Market can't access >.< Camera on Optimus 7
Imagine Nokia's Carl Zeiss with Windows Phone

And I tried Nokia E7 at Gardens. Symbian sure look like a turtle compared to the responsiveness on Windows Phone.
Waiting for Nokia with Windows Phone. I'm sure it'd be awesome.

This post has been edited by hengguowei: May 29 2011, 02:08 AM

testing html5 on

default - 29
mini browser - 235
opera mobile - 234

our default browser really pathetic

woops didnt see our browser use html4.1

This post has been edited by apecx92: May 29 2011, 02:06 AM

iDunCare got HTML 5 and are obsessly in love with HTML 5 that they don't support Flash

Nokia N8 @ Danbo wants molome by thenokiagallery, on Flickr

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: May 29 2011, 02:16 AM

told u long time ago.most smooth os.problemless.upgrade to mango make it even better.But ui,gps have to improve.market can access.i download couple application from marketplace.

You appear on today's paper...

This post has been edited by andrekua: May 29 2011, 09:58 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)

What the hell man? Which part of that is me? You need your eyes checked.

I like Windows Phone now. It is simple enough to beat iOS.
GPS got Nokia back them already. Wow, it's gonna be perfect!
Market accesible. Hmph, okay.
Nokia should announce a Mango device within this year right or even more than 1 but put some provision for Nokia as Nokia is always slightly behind schedule. >.<

Well, same like iOS, simplfied and lack of features; That's one key point for stability and less problems.

Basic rules in development (or any other fields), the more complciated/sophisticated, the more doors you open, the harder to maintain, control, etc. and the more work you need to do.


Not really, it's just an excuse for not providing Flash. Nothing wrong to provide, they can "turn off" the support by default and let user choose whether they want to have that feature and take the risk of the problems like lag, slower response, hang, etc.
I don't buy their excuses, don't have say don't have, don't want to provide say don't want to provide, don't give excuses, especially lame ones.

Plus, the videos I posted before for Windows Phone, iDunCare performs the worst for HTML5 rendering with only 2 frames per second, Android got 10 frames per second while Windows Phone with IE9 utilizing hardware acceleration renders at 24 frames per second.
Still waiting for Windows Phone to support Flash; the news about Adobe creating Flash for Windows Phone has been announce since early 2010. Now, I only read, both Adobe and MS are "still" working on it.

A 'photoshop' version of you cosplay Ace.. but with shirt... just feel the similarity nia... not you for sure

He looks nothing like me.

really? i tot after Steve Job ditched Flash, and Google also do the same, they not gonna develop Flash for Windows Phone.

Flash = memory hogger, fking complicated codes and it's Adobe.
HTML5 = much more lighter, simple codes, and it's from W3C, not some money forking company.

iOS = simple
Symbian = ?
Android = ?
WP7 = ?

Nokia N8 Blue Edition in action by thenokiagallery, on Flickr



This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: May 29 2011, 11:32 AM

Yup, it's still being used by many nonetheless; If don't want to support or provide, then just say it, don't give "lame" excuses; That's what I trying to say.

They can always give OPTION for the user. "Turn on support for Flash", then put a disclaimer.
Not providing and giving "lame" excuses is another story.
BUT anyway, I'm just nobody and they don't need EVERY TYPE of user to use their device, every device has its target users; Just like cars, there is different segment, different types, that suit different people.


Let's put it this way, if Windows given ONLY "Guest" account to the user, then as an admin, you have lots of control over the user and you have less worry what the user is capable of doing; If you can control they can only run 1 application at 1 time, not allow them to run certain programs, no access to certain features, etc. You can pretty much be sure there will be less complain to the user (unless they are intermediate-advance users).
The problem is iOS? They never give ANY OPTION to the user. Everyone is treated as the same, regardless you're "professional" or someone who have never used a computer before.

As for other "smartphone", perhaps they should make their OS "DEFAULT" as simple as possible, then the intermediate-advance users can choose to enable the advance options; But then, the "normal" users might ask, "How come your device can do this and mine can't".

Of course, you have to understand above usage of "account" is an EXAMPLE. In just like software development, we try to make it simple to the users and prevent them from making problems, etc. Depending on the software you develop and user coverage, the simple part is, the software might be target to small scale (e.g. company, and there's not really the need to make the program/software "boombastic", BUT as a developer, we can always make it more flexible for the user through turning on certain options.)
For example: The search function, for most simple user, they just use the search. We don't give them the "Advanced Search" by default, the user can "choose" to use it, IF they know how to use it. Even if they starting out as SIMPLE user, then can eventually upgrade and learn. If we only LOCK them with simple search function, then next time they saw another software which offers "Advance Search", they'll be like point blank, and they said, I prefer the previous software, more easy to use? *HINT* this is also a "dirty" strategy to keep your user.

Just my cheap cheap 2 cents lah.

Sifu Andy always very wise. I think is best you save your time, effort to explain. This debate being going on for too long. They keep comparing the weakness of the device with something better. Sure lose u notice they do not how to compare the device camera. Like the topic titled stated king of camera phone. It didnt said king of web browser. Is best you write your opinion on your blog or find a more mature environment u get better feedback or response.

My 2 cents

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: May 29 2011, 12:31 PM

Every phone got their own pros and cons.the phone suit ur needs and demands then its a good phone.

Hahaha... Some people don't really know the difference between OS and hardware. Keep comparing the camera la, camera la and camera la. Camera can upgrade hor? Can change lens hor? Sorry lor, I'm not interested in taking pics at all. Still, I won't go and tell you don't post your pics geh, just asking to spoiler tag nia n dun repeatly post same pics ge je.

Ya, I still wanna learn how to jailbreak le. For now, I just break my bank account first.

Mmm doesn't matter la. Who the hell keep surfing on Flash websites on mobile? I mean a really flash websites, not like youtube and such.

I just wondered, why other smartphones manufacturer didn't make things like BIS? Cheap, yet sufficient for social sites-holic. Isn't more practical than paying an expensive bill for mobile broadband.